“Criticism is not religion, and by no process can it be substituted for it. It is not the critic's eye, but the child's heart, that most truly discerns the countenance that looks out from the pages of the gospel.”

— John Campbell Shairp

Source: Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers (1895), P. 168.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Criticism is not religion, and by no process can it be substituted for it. It is not the critic's eye, but the child's …" by John Campbell Shairp?

John Campbell Shairp 14

British writer 1819–1885

Related quotes

“We are but critics, or but half create,
Timid, entangled, empty and abashed,
Lacking the countenance of our friends.”

W.B. Yeats (1865–1939) Irish poet and playwright

Ego Dominus Tuus http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/1478/, st. 4
The Wild Swans at Coole (1919)
Context: We have lit upon the gentle, sensitive mind
And lost the old nonchalance of the hand;
Whether we have chosen chisel, pen or brush,
We are but critics, or but half create,
Timid, entangled, empty and abashed,
Lacking the countenance of our friends.

“In response to criticism from Democratic mayoral candidates for appearing at a 2004 event for the Independence Party: "To all the critics who are rushing out to criticize me tonight, criticize me for being here tonight, let me point out that this night is about the one million New Yorkers who are denied the most basic rights by the two major political parties."”

Michael Bloomberg (1942) American businessman and politician, former mayor of New York City

http://www.independentvoting.org/Bloomberg.html
Politics

“Religion must be considered vindicated in a certain way from the attacks of her critics.”

William James (1842–1910) American philosopher, psychologist, and pragmatist

Lecture XX, "Conclusions"
1900s, The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902)
Context: Religion must be considered vindicated in a certain way from the attacks of her critics. It would seem that she cannot be a mere anachronism and survival, but must exert a permanent function, whether she be with or without intellectual content, and whether, if she have any, it be true or false.
We must next pass beyond the point of view of merely subjective utility, and make inquiry into the intellectual content itself.
First, is there, under all the discrepancies of the creeds, a common nucleus to which they bear their testimony unanimously?
And second, ought we to consider the testimony true?
I will take up the first question first, and answer it immediately in the affirmative. The warring gods and formulas of the various religions do indeed cancel each other, but there is a certain uniform deliverance in which religions all appear to meet. It consists of two parts: —
1. An uneasiness; and
2. Its solution.
1. The uneasiness, reduced to its simplest terms, is a sense that there is something wrong about us as we naturally stand.
2. The solution is a sense that we are saved from the wrongness by making proper connection with the higher powers.

“God never gives us discernment in order that we may criticize, but that we may intercede.”

Oswald Chambers (1874–1917) British missionary

“We don't criticize them, so why criticize Walter Keane just because his symbol of humanity is a child?”

Walter Keane (1915–2000) American plagiarist

Referring to himself in the third person, page 39. "Them" refers to Rembrandt, El Greco, and Michelangelo.
1965, Cited by Jane Howard

“Two aspects of this work process are of critical importance.”

Charles Perrow (1925–2019) American sociologist

1960s, "Hospitals: technology, structure and goals", 1965

“Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain — and most fools do.”

Benjamin Franklin (1706–1790) American author, printer, political theorist, politician, postmaster, scientist, inventor, civic activist, …

Attributed in various post-2000 works, but actually Dale Carnegie in How to Win Friends and Influence People p.14 http://books.google.com/books?id=yxfJDVXClucC&pg=PA14&dq=fool, published in 1936. (N.B. Carnegie is quoting Franklin immediately prior to writing this, so attribution could be due to a printing error in some edition).
Misattributed