Part I : Declaration, Ch. IV : Mr. Spencer's Confusion as to Rights
A Perplexed Philosopher (1892)
Context: Men must have rights before they can have equal rights. Each man has a right to use the world because he is here and wants to use the world. The equality of this right is merely a limitation arising from the presence of others with like rights. Society, in other words, does not grant, and cannot equitably withhold from any individual, the right to the use of land. That right exists before society and independently of society, belonging at birth to each individual, and ceasing only with his death. Society itself has no original right to the use of land. What right it has with regard to the use of land is simply that which is derived from and is necessary to the determination of the rights of the individuals who compose it. That is to say, the function of society with regard to the use of land only begins where individual rights clash, and is to secure equality between these clashing rights of individuals.
“One can conclude that certain essential, or fundamental, rights should exist in any just society. It does not follow that each of those essential rights is one that we as judges can enforce under the written Constitution. The Due Process Clause is not a guarantee of every right that should inhere in an ideal system. Many argue that a just society grants a right to engage in homosexual conduct. If that view is accepted, the Bowers decision in effect says the State of Georgia has the right to make a wrong decision — wrong in the sense that it violates some people's views of rights in a just society. We can extend that slightly to say that Georgia's right to be wrong in matters not specifically controlled by the Constitution is a necessary component of its own political processes. Its citizens have the political liberty to direct the governmental process to make decisions that might be wrong in the ideal sense, subject to correction in the ordinary political process.”
[Unenumerated Rights and the Dictates of Judicial Restraint, Address to the Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies, Stanford University. Palo Alto, California., http://web.archive.org/web/20080627022153/http://www.andrewhyman.com/1986kennedyspeech.pdf, 24 July 1986 to 1 August 1986, 13] (Also quoted at p. 443 of Kennedy's 1987 confirmation transcript http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/senate/judiciary/sh100-1037/browse.html).
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Anthony Kennedy 28
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States 1936Related quotes
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).
Full Court Reference in Memory of The Late Justice M. Hidayatullah
Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 374-75 (1971).
Source: Shouting Fire: Civil liberties in a Turbulent Age (2002), p. 34
Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931).
Judicial opinions
Cyber Rights — cited in [Hudson, David, Net freedom ring, Salon, Salon Media Group, July 16, 1998, http://www.salon.com/21st/books/1998/07/16books.html, 2009-12-17, http://web.archive.org/web/20000202020328/http://www.salon.com/21st/books/1998/07/16books.html, 2000-02-02]
Cyber Rights
Interview by Sabahattin Atas, circa September 2003 (see also: Necessary Illusions https://web.archive.org/web/20000307213545/http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/ni/ni-c10-s16.html) http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/200309--.htm.
Quotes 2000s, 2003
1980s, First term of office (1981–1985), Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation (1983)