Shivaji and his Times, pages 479-480, by Sir Jadunath Sarkar; published by Orient Longman.
“So that, in the Islamic state, Delhi was not the capital of the empire; it was Quwwat-ul-Islam. The king was not the ruler of the people; he was Amir-ul-Mauminin, “the conqueror of infidels and shelterer of Islam.” The army was not the royal army; it was Lashkar-i-Islam. The soldier was not a cavalry man or infantry man; he was Ahl-i-Jihad. The law of the state was not any secular or humanitarian law; it was Shariat, the law of Islam. The state was not an end in itself, like the Greek state, but a means of sub-serving the interests of Islam. Conquests were made, shrines were broken, captives were taken, converts were made - all in the name of Islam. The raison d’etre of the regime was to disseminate the Islamic faith.”
Source: The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India (1992), Chapter 4
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
K. S. Lal 57
Indian historian 1920–2002Related quotes
Imam's Sahife, vol. 5, p. 133. (17 December 1978)
Foreign policy
295-296
Pakistan or The Partition of India (1946)
294
Pakistan or The Partition of India (1946)
Source: The Principles of State and Government in Islam (1961), Chapter 6: Conclusion, p 96
1970, Jihad in Islam' (Jihad Fi Sabillilah), Transl. Abdul Waheed Khan, page 20, Islamic Publications Ltd, Pakistan.
1970s
Source: This Law of Ours and Other Essays (1987), Chapter: Answers of Islam, Answer to Question # 24, p 165
Source: The Islamic Declaration (1970), p. 26.
1960s
Source: 1967 Islamic Law and Constitution, Mawdudi's writings collected and translated into English by Khurshid Ahmad, p. 77; quoted in: Charles J. Adam, "Mawdudi and the Islamic State," in John L. Esposito, ed., Voices of Resurgent Islam, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983) on page 125.
"Imam's Sahife" vol. 4 p. 244 (1 November 1978).
Foreign policy