
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
United States v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78 (1944)
Judicial opinions
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Environmentalism as a Religion (2003)
Context: Most of us have had some experience interacting with religious fundamentalists, and we understand that one of the problems with fundamentalists is that they have no perspective on themselves. They never recognize that their way of thinking is just one of many other possible ways of thinking, which may be equally useful or good. On the contrary, they believe their way is the right way, everyone else is wrong; they are in the business of salvation, and they want to help you to see things the right way. They want to help you be saved. They are totally rigid and totally uninterested in opposing points of view. In our modern complex world, fundamentalism is dangerous because of its rigidity and its imperviousness to other ideas.
Source: Science and the Unseen World (1929), Ch. IV, p.48-49
Section 9 : Ethical Outlook
Life and Destiny (1913)
78 U.S. 93
Judicial opinions, United States v. Ballard (1944)
Introduction: an evolutionary riddle, p. 16
In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion (2002)
As quoted in George Edward Martin, The Foundations of Geometry and the Non-Euclidean Plane, Springer (1998 [1975]), p. 225; also in Stanley Gudder, A Mathematical Journey, McGraw-Hill (1976), p. 36.
1940s, The World As I See It (1949)