An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (1940), Introduction, p. 15
1940s
Context: Science seems to be at war with itself.... Naive realism leads to physics, and physics, if true, shows naive realism to be false. Therefore naive realism, if true, is false; therefore it is false.
“Scientific realism in classical (i. e. pre-quantum) physics has remained compatible with the naive realism of everyday thinking on the whole; whereas it has proven impossible to find any consistent way to visualize the world underlying quantum theory in terms of our pictures in the everyday world. The general conclusion is that in quantum theory naive realism, although necessary at the level of observations, fails at the microscopic level.”
R.Gomatam's paper Physics and Commonsense - Reassessing the connection in the light of the quantum theory http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1536, 2004.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Ravi Gomatam 6
Indian academic 1950Related quotes
R. H. Dalitz and F. J. Duarte, John Clive Ward, Physics Today 53, 99-100 (2000).
R. H. Dalitz and F. J. Duarte, John Clive Ward, Physics Today 53, 99-100 (2000).
[The information paradox, arXiv preprint arXiv:hep-th/0612061v2, 14 December 2006, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0612061] (See also Thorne-Hawking-Preskill bet.)
"Testing Quantum Mechanics" http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491689902765, Annals of Physics (1989)
"Introduction: John Bell and the second quantum revolution" (2004)
Source: The Corporate Revolution in America, 1957, p. 287
The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next (2007)
Source: Quantum Reality - Beyond The New Physics, Chapter 8, "And Then A Miracle Occurs": The Quantum Measurement Problem, p. 150