Defence of Criminals: A Criticism of Morality (1889)
“Law represents from age to age the code of the dominant or ruling class, slowly accumulated, no doubt, and slowly modified, but always added to and always administered by the ruling class. Today the code of the dominant class may perhaps best be denoted by the word Respectability—and if we ask why this code has to a great extent overwhelmed the codes of the other classes and got the law on its side (so far that in the main it characterises those classes who do not conform to it as the criminal classes), the answer can only be: Because it is the code of the classes who are in power. Respectability is the code of those who have the wealth and the command, and as these have also the fluent pens and tongues, it is the standard of modern literature and the press. It is not necessarily a better standard than others, but it is the one that happens to be in the ascendant; it is the code of the classes that chiefly represent modern society; it is the code of the Bourgeoisie. It is different from the Feudal code of the past, of the knightly classes, and of Chivalry; it is different from the Democratic code of the future—of brotherhood and of equality; it is the code of the Commercial age and its distinctive watchword is—property.
The Respectability of today is the respectability of property. There is nothing so respectable as being well-off.”
Defence of Criminals: A Criticism of Morality (1889)
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Edward Carpenter 19
British poet and academic 1844–1929Related quotes
“When they talk about legal status, that's code for second-class status.”
May 5, 2015
Presidential campaign (April 12, 2015 – 2016)
Source: Law and Authority (1886), III
Interview from Programmers at Work (1986)
Source: Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang, 1955, p. 110
The Problems of Leninism
No Compromise – No Political Trading (1899)
The Junius Pamphlet http://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1915/junius/index.htm (1915)
Context: Bourgeois class domination is undoubtedly an historical necessity, but, so too, the rising of the working class against it. Capital is an historical necessity, but, so too, its grave digger, the socialist proletariat.