“No scientist has yet provided an acceptable definition of "mind" or "mental" that reveals the character of "unconscious mental processes," and no physicist a lucid definition of "elementary particles" that shows how they can appear or disappear, and why there are so many.”

Essay on Atomism: From Democritus to 1960 (1961)

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "No scientist has yet provided an acceptable definition of "mind" or "mental" that reveals the character of "unconscious…" by Lancelot Law Whyte?
Lancelot Law Whyte photo
Lancelot Law Whyte 62
Scottish industrial engineer 1896–1972

Related quotes

Arthur Stanley Eddington photo
Fritjof Capra photo

“Subatomic particles do not exist but rather show 'tendencies to exist', and atomic events do not occur with certainty at definite times and in definite ways, but rather show 'tendencies to occur'.”

Source: The Turning Point (1982), p. 82.
Source: The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism
Context: At the subatomic level, matter does not exist with certainty at definite places, but rather shows "tendencies to exist," and atomic events do not occur with certainty at definite times and in definite ways, but rather show "tendencies to occur."

Michael Pollan photo

“Evolution doesn’t depend on will or intention to work; it is, almost by definition, an unconscious, unwilled process.”

Introduction “The Human Bumblebee” (p. xxi)
The Botany of Desire (2001)

Ayn Rand photo

“Definitions are the guardians of rationality, the first line of defense against the chaos of mental disintegration.”

Source: The Romantic Manifesto (1969), Chapter 3 ("Art and Cognition")

S. H. Raza photo
Edward O. Wilson photo

“My definition of a scientist is that you can complete the following sentence: ‘he or she has shown that…”

Edward O. Wilson (1929) American biologist

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/why-richard-dawkins-is-no-scientist-the-survival-of-the-least-selfish-and-what-ants-can-tell-us-about-humans-eo-wilson-on-his-new-book-the-meaning-of-human-existence-9849956.html

Alice A. Bailey photo
Karl Marx photo

“The fact is, therefore, that definite individuals who are productively active in a definite way enter into these definite social and political relations. Empirical observation must in each separate instance bring out empirically, and without any mystification and speculation, the connection of the social and political structure with production. The social structure and the state are continually evolving out of the life-process of definite individuals, but of individuals, not as they appear in their own or other people's imagination, but as they really are; i.e. as they are effective, produce materially, and are active under definite material limits, presuppositions and conditions independent of their will.
The production of ideas, of conceptions, of consciousness, is at first directly interwoven with the material activity and the material intercourse of men, the language of real life. Conceiving, thinking, the mental intercourse of men, appear at this stage as the direct efflux of their material behaviour. The same applies to mental production as expressed in the language of the politics, laws, morality, religion, metaphysics of a people. Men are the producers of their conception, ideas, etc.”

real, active men, as they are conditioned by a definite development of their productive forces and of the intercourse corresponding to these, up to its furthest forms. Consciousness can never be anything else than conscious existence, and the existence of men is their actual life-process. If in all ideology men and their circumstances appear upside down as in a camera obscura, this phenomenon arises just as much from their historical life-process as the inversion of objects on the retina does from their physical life-process.
Source: The German Ideology (1845-1846)

Related topics