Epeli Ganilau (1951) Fijian politician
Views on the chiefly system
Jacob Leupold (1724-39) Theatrium machinarum, as quoted in: Biography of Jacob Leupold (1674–1727) http://history-computer.com/People/LeupoldBio.html on history-computer.com, 2013
Epeli Ganilau (1951) Fijian politician
Views on the chiefly system
Thomas Robert Malthus Principles of Political Economy
Advertisement to the Second Edition, p. vii
Principles of Political Economy (Second Edition 1836)
James Whitbread Lee Glaisher (1848–1928) English mathematician and astronomer
Source: "Presidential Address British Association for the Advancement of Science," 1890, p. 466 : On the expansion of the field of mathematics, and on the importance of a well-chosen notation
John Wallis (1616–1703) English mathematician
(1635) as quoted by W. W. Rouse Ball, A History of the Study of Mathematics at Cambridge https://books.google.com/books?id=Pl32YkKFIhsC (1889) pp. 41-42.
John Mason (1706–1763) English Independent minister and author
A Treatise on Self-Knowledge (1745)
Henry Gantt (1861–1919) American engineer
Source: Work, Wages, and Profits: Their Influence on the Cost of Living. 1910, p. 5.
Everett Dean Martin (1880–1941)
Source: Psychology: What it has to Teach You about Yourself and Your World (1924), p. 83
Jacques Derrida (1930–2004) French philosopher (1930-2004)
Derrida Jacques, Elisabeth Weber (1995), Points...: Interviews, 1974-1994. p. 115
James McCosh (1811–1894) British philosopher
Source: Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers (1895), P. 429.
Novalis (1772–1801) German poet and writer
Novalis (1829)
Context: When we speak of the aim and Art observable in Shakespeare's works, we must not forget that Art belongs to Nature; that it is, so to speak, self-viewing, self-imitating, self-fashioning Nature. The Art of a well-developed genius is far different from the Artfulness of the Understanding, of the merely reasoning mind. Shakspeare was no calculator, no learned thinker; he was a mighty, many-gifted soul, whose feelings and works, like products of Nature, bear the stamp of the same spirit; and in which the last and deepest of observers will still find new harmonies with the infinite structure of the Universe; concurrences with later ideas, affinities with the higher powers and senses of man. They are emblematic, have many meanings, are simple and inexhaustible, like products of Nature; and nothing more unsuitable could be said of them than that they are works of Art, in that narrow mechanical acceptation of the word.