 
                            
                        
                        
                        "What's in a Sign?", in Signs of Orality. The Oral Tradition and its Influence in the Greek and Roman World, ed. E. Anne MacKay (1999), p. 3
Source: 1960s, The Gutenberg Galaxy (1962), p. 126
"What's in a Sign?", in Signs of Orality. The Oral Tradition and its Influence in the Greek and Roman World, ed. E. Anne MacKay (1999), p. 3
“A work has two levels of meaning: literal and concealed.”
                                        
                                        Proposition 3
Variant translation: The Text can be approached, experienced, in reaction to the sign. The work closes on a signified. There are two modes of signification which can be attributed to this signified: either it is claimed to be evident and the work is then the object of a literal science, of philology, or else it is considered to be secret, ultimate, something to be sought out, and the work then falls under the scope of a hermeneutics, of an interpretation 
From Work to Text (1971) 
Context: A work has two levels of meaning: literal and concealed.
A Text, on the other hand is engaged in a movement … a deferral … a dilation of meaning … the play of signification.
Metonymy — the association of part to whole — characterized the logic of the Text.
In this sense the Text is "radically symbolic" and lacks closure.
                                    
Source: Against Interpretation and Other Essays (1966), p. 6
Source: Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics, 1995, p. 35
                                        
                                        endorsing Barack Obama, Telegraph Column, October 21, 2008 
2000s, 2008
                                    
                                        
                                        10 
Essays, Can Poetry Matter? (1991), Poetry as Enchantment (2015)
                                    
Source: Défense des Lettres [In Defense of Letters] (1937), p. 21
Interview with Michael Joyce in Pif (January 2000)
                                        
                                        Technopoly: the Surrender of Culture to Technology (1992) 
Context: Technological competition ignites total war, which means it is not possible to contain the effects of a new technology to a limited sphere of human activity... What we need to consider about the computer has nothing to do with its efficiency as a teaching tool. We need to know in what ways it is altering our conception of learning, and how, in conjunction with television, it undermines the old idea of school.
                                    
 
                            
                        
                        
                         
                            
                        
                        
                         
                            
                        
                        
                         
                            
                        
                        
                        