“Friends… they cherish one another's hopes. They are kind to one another's dreams.”
Source: A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Do you have more details about the quote "Be kind to one another. Bye, bye." by Ellen DeGeneres?
Ellen DeGeneres 93
American stand-up comedian, television host, and actress 1958Related quotes
“One can't be kind to one person and cruel to another.”
Morarji Desai
(1896–1995) Former Indian Finance Minister, Freedom Fighters, Former prime minister
19th World Vegetarian Congress 1967
“No kind action ever stops with itself. One kind action leads to another.”
Amelia Earhart
(1897–1937) American aviation pioneer and author
Originally Frederick William Faber, sermon "On Kindness in General", found in Spiritual Conferences, a collection of his oratory, ca. 1860
Misattributed
Context: No kind action ever stops with itself. One kind action leads to another. Good example is followed. A single act of kindness throws out roots in all directions, and the roots spring up and make new trees. The greatest work that kindness does to others is that it makes them kind themselves.
“What kind of a universe would it be if we could not do small kindnesses for one another?”
Sheri S. Tepper
(1929–2016) American fiction writer
Source: The Marianne Trilogy, Marianne, the Madame, and the Momentary Gods (1988), Chapter 17 (p. 123)
“Nationalism of one kind or another was the cause of most of the genocide of the twentieth century.”
Arundhati Roy
(1961) Indian novelist, essayist
Source: Articles, Come September (29 Sep 2002)
“Monopoly of one kind or another, indeed, seems to be the sole engine of the mercantile system.”
Adam Smith
(1723–1790) Scottish moral philosopher and political economist
Source: (1776), Book IV, Chapter VII, Part Third, p. 684.
Muriel Rukeyser
(1913–1980) poet and political activist
Note, on "The Book of the Dead"
U.S. 1 (1938), The Book of the Dead
Context: This is to be a summary poem of the life of the Atlantic coast of this country, nourished by the communications which run down it. Gauley Bridge is inland, but it was created by theories, systems, and workmen from many coastal sections — factors which are, in the end, not regional or national. Local images have one kind of reality. U. S. 1 will, I hope, have that kind and another too. Poetry can extend the document.
Philip Wicksteed
(1844–1927) English economist
Pages 22–23.
"The Scope and Method of Political Economy in the Light of the 'Marginal' Theory of Value and Distribution" (1914), §II
Context: Social reformers and legislators will never be economists, and they will always work on economic theory of one kind or another. They will quote and apply such dicta as they can assimilate, and such acknowledged principles as seem to serve their turn. Let us suppose there were a recognised body of economic doctrine the truth and relevancy of which perpetually revealed itself to all who looked below the surface, which taught men what to expect and how to analyse their experience; which insisted at every turn on the illuminating relation between our conduct in life and our conduct in business; which drove the analysis of our daily administration of our individual resources deeper, and thereby dissipated the mist that hangs about our economic relations, and concentrated attention upon the uniting and all-penetrating principles of our study. Economics might even then be no more than a feeble barrier against passion, and might afford but a feeble light to guide honest enthusiasm, but it would exert a steady and a cumulative pressure, making for the truth. While the experts worked on severer methods than ever, popularisers would be found to drive homely illustrations and analogies into the general consciousness; and the roughly understood dicta bandied about in the name of Political Economy would at any rate stand in some relation to truth and to experience, instead of being, as they too often are at present, a mere armoury of consecrated paradoxes that cannot be understood because they are not true, that every one uses as weapons while no one grasps them as principles.