“Is the choice between forms of regimes -- democratic regimes that is, that we find often in the free world, particularly in the West -- a path through which Iran can find its salvation? Here I understand fundamentally that some of the values that are embedded in Western society -- liberty, equality, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, media, labor unions, human rights, a democratic establishment, a checks and balance system, a separation of religion from government -- are opposed to any system that is based on an ideology that is totalitarian or that is against fascist or discriminatory vis-à-vis a great portion of its own citizens. Obviously, if you give that choice to people, the choice is clear. I think that is the choice that the Iranian people today are faced with and it goes without saying that obviously they are up for the former rather than the latter if given the opportunity.”

As quoted by Felice Friedson, Iranian Crown Prince: Ahmadinejad&#x27;s regime is &quot;delicate and fragile&quot; http://www.rezapahlavi.org/details_article.php?article=459&amp;page=2, August 12, 2010. <br class="br">Interviews, 2010

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Is the choice between forms of regimes -- democratic regimes that is, that we find often in the free world, particularl…" by Reza Pahlavi?
Reza Pahlavi photo
Reza Pahlavi100
Last crown prince of the former Imperial State of Iran 1960

Related quotes

Stephen Harper photo
Sam Harris photo
George Fitzhugh photo
Rudolph Rummel photo

“Socialism aside, there also has been a rejection of Western values, of which individual freedom is prominent, and acceptance of some form of value-relativism (thus, no political system is better than any other). In some cases this rejection has turned to outright hostility and particularly anti-Americanism, and thus opposition to American values, such as freedom. To accept, therefore, that democratic freedom is inherently most peaceful, is to the value-relativist, to say the unacceptable—that it is better.”

Rudolph Rummel (1932–2014) American academic

“Political Systems, Violence, and War,” chap. 14, in "Approaches to Peace: An Intellectual Map", edit, W. Scott Thompson and Kenneth M. Jensen, Washington, D.C., United States Institute of Peace, 1991, pp. 347-370; and “The Politics of Cold Blood,” Society, Vol. 27 (November/December, 1989) pp. 32-40

Reza Pahlavi photo

“The choice of future government should be left to the Iranian people to decide in a free election… What form it ultimately takes is up to them. The essential point to me is that there is no way we can achieve our aspirations as a nation unless we have a secular regime, as opposed to this theocracy… Without a clear separation of the state and religion you cannot have the beginning of any form of democratic system.”

Reza Pahlavi (1960) Last crown prince of the former Imperial State of Iran

As quoted in Peter Godspeed, &#x27;It is my duty&#x27; http://www.rezapahlavi.org/details_article.php?article=462&amp;page=2, Canada National Post, September 24, 2010. <br class="br">Interviews, 2010

Rudolph Rummel photo
John Gray photo
Barack Obama photo

“how can a democratic discourse exist in a corporate owned informational system? Who, for example, possesses freedom of speech in such a society?”

Herbert Schiller (1919–2000) American media critic

Source: Living In The Number One Country (2000), Chapter Five, Corporatizing Communication And Culture, p. 138

Saul D. Alinsky photo

Related topics