
On his approach to science popularization
An Exclusive Interview with Prof. Jayant Vishnu Narlikar
The trial of Charles B. Reynolds for blasphemy (1887)
Context: We have now a science called astronomy. That science has done more to enlarge the horizon of human thought than all things else. We now live in an infinite universe. We know that the sun is a million times larger than our earth, and we know that there are other great luminaries millions of times larger than our sun. We know that there are planets so far away that light, traveling at the rate of one hundred and eighty- five thousand miles a second, requires fifteen thousand years to reach this grain of sand, this tear, we call the earth -- and we now know that all the fields of space are sown thick with constellations. If that statute had been enforced, that science would not now be the property of the human mind. That science is contrary to the Bible, and for asserting the truth you become a criminal. For what sum of money, for what amount of wealth, would the world have the science of astronomy expunged from the brain of man? We learned the story of the stars in spite of that statute.
On his approach to science popularization
An Exclusive Interview with Prof. Jayant Vishnu Narlikar
As quoted by W. K. Hancock in SMUTS 2: The Fields of Force 1919-1950, p. 395
Interview with Oriana Fallaci (2 December 1979), Corriere della Sera
Interviews
“Of all the sciences, astronomy was the one the superstitious liked least.”
Source: Learning the World (2005), Chapter 4 “A Moving Point of Light” (p. 51)
“Religion has no more place in science than science has in religion.”
Answer from Pasteur to his disciple Elie Metchnikoff when was questioned whether his approach to spontaneous generation was bound to a religious ideal. According to Patrice Debré's Luis Pasteur, 2000 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RzOcl-FLw30C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA176#v=onepage&q&f=false,, p. 176.
Disputed
Source: Attributed in posthumous publications, Einstein and the Poet (1983), p. 92