Jeanne W. Ross (1958) American computer scientist
Source: IT governance, 2004, p. 7 as cited in: Wim Van Grembergen, Steven De Haes (2009) Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. p. 5
Source: The Rise of Endymion (1997), Chapter 1 (p. 10)
Jeanne W. Ross (1958) American computer scientist
Source: IT governance, 2004, p. 7 as cited in: Wim Van Grembergen, Steven De Haes (2009) Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. p. 5
Mitt Romney (1947) American businessman and politician
2012-10-26
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/10/26/transcript-mitt-romney-delivers-speech-on-the-economy/
TRANSCRIPT: Mitt Romney Delivers Speech on the Economy
Fox News
2012
John Thibaut (1917–1986) American social psychologist
Source: "A theory of procedure." 1978, p. 541
Sol LeWitt (1928–2007) American artist
as quoted in Gerhard Richter, Doubt and belief in painting, Robert Storr, MOMA, New York, 2003, p. 88, note 17
Quotes of Sol Lewitt
George Long (1800–1879) English classical scholar
An Old Man's Thoughts on Many Things, Of Education I
Daniel Defoe (1660–1731) English trader, writer and journalist
Pt. I, l. 360-363. <br class="br"> The True-Born Englishman http://www.luminarium.org/editions/trueborn.htm (1701)
Billy Joel (1949) American singer-songwriter and pianist
Pressure.
Song lyrics, The Nylon Curtain (1982)
Frank Knight (1885–1972) American economist
Source: The Ethics of Competition, 1935, p. 11
H.L. Mencken (1880–1956) American journalist and writer
The American Mercury (May 1930)
1930s
Context: Laws are no longer made by a rational process of public discussion; they are made by a process of blackmail and intimidation, and they are executed in the same manner. The typical lawmaker of today is a man wholly devoid of principle — a mere counter in a grotesque and knavish game. If the right pressure could be applied to him, he would be cheerfully in favor of polygamy, astrology or cannibalism.
It is the aim of the Bill of Rights, if it has any remaining aim at all, to curb such prehensile gentry. Its function is to set a limitation upon their power to harry and oppress us to their own private profit. The Fathers, in framing it, did not have powerful minorities in mind; what they sought to hobble was simply the majority. But that is a detail. The important thing is that the Bill of Rights sets forth, in the plainest of plain language, the limits beyond which even legislatures may not go. The Supreme Court, in Marbury v. Madison, decided that it was bound to execute that intent, and for a hundred years that doctrine remained the corner-stone of American constitutional law.