Alain Aspect (1947) French physicist
"Introduction: John Bell and the second quantum revolution" (2004)
https://motls.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-string-theory-is-quantum-mechanics.html <br class="br"> The Reference Frame http://motls.blogspot.com/
Alain Aspect (1947) French physicist
"Introduction: John Bell and the second quantum revolution" (2004)
Steven Weinberg (1933) American theoretical physicist
"Testing Quantum Mechanics" http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491689902765, Annals of Physics (1989)
Leonard Mandel (1927–2001) German physicist
as quoted by James Glanz, in Leonard Mandel, 73, Revealer Of Light's Weirdness, Is Dead http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/13/nyregion/leonard-mandel-73-revealer-of-light-s-weirdness-is-dead.html?sec=&spon=, New York Times (Tuesday, February 13, 2001)
Sidney Coleman (1937–2007) American physicist
Quantum Mechanics in Your Face http://www.physics.harvard.edu/about/video.html, a lecture given by Sidney Coleman at the New England sectional meeting of the American Physical Society (Apr. 9, 1994)
Paul Dirac book Principles of Quantum Mechanics
I. The Principle of Superposition - 1. The Need for a Quantum Theory
The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (4th ed. 1958)
John S. Bell (1928–1990) Northern Irish physicist
On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics (1966)
Nathan Seiberg (1956) American physicist
[Emergent spacetime, arXiv preprint hep-th/0601234, 2006, 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0601234]
Erwin Schrödinger (1887–1961) Austrian physicist
italics in the original
DISCUSSION OF PROBABILITY RELATIONS BETWEEN SEPARATED SYSTEMS (1935)
Roger Ebert (1942–2013) American film critic, author, journalist, and TV presenter
Source: Life Itself : A Memoir (2011), Ch. 54 : How I Believe In God
Context: Quantum theory is now discussing instantaneous connections between two entangled quantum objects such as electrons. This phenomenon has been observed in laboratory experiments and scientists believe they have proven it takes place. They’re not talking about faster than the speed of light. Speed has nothing to do with it. The entangled objects somehow communicate instantaneously at a distance. If that is true, distance has no meaning. Light-years have no meaning. Space has no meaning. In a sense, the entangled objects are not even communicating. They are the same thing. At the “quantum level” (and I don’t know what that means), everything may be actually or theoretically linked. All is one. Sun, moon, stars, rain, you, me, everything. All one. If this is so, then Buddhism must have been a quantum theory all along. No, I am not a Buddhist. I am not a believer, not an atheist, not an agnostic. I am more content with questions than answers.
Nico van Kampen (1921–2013) Dutch theoretical physicist
The Scandal of Quantum Mechanics (2008)