“Maximizing is not optimizing. Sustainable engagement wins, in the end.”

—  David Allen

8 October 2010 https://twitter.com/gtdguy/status/26778825813
Official Twitter profile (@gtdguy) https://twitter.com/gtdguy

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Maximizing is not optimizing. Sustainable engagement wins, in the end." by David Allen?
David Allen photo
David Allen 119
American productivity consultant and author 1945

Related quotes

“The assumption that individuals act objectively in accordance with purely mathematical dictates to maximize their gain or utility cannot be sustained by empirical observation.”

Richard Arnold Epstein (1927) American physicist

Epilogue, p. 410
The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic (Revised Edition) 1977

Jiang Qing photo

“Sex is engaging in the first rounds. What sustains interest in the long run is political power.”

Jiang Qing (1914–1991) Chinese political figure and wife of Mao Zedong

Her statement in an interview.
Source: "Suicide of Jiang Qing, Mao's Widow, Is Reported" in The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/1991/06/05/obituaries/suicide-of-jiang-qing-mao-s-widow-is-reported.html (5 June 1991)

Jacy Reese photo

“A big reason for optimism about the end of animal farming is that it doesn't have to be the end of meat.”

Jacy Reese (1992) American social scientist

The End of Animal Farming: How Scientists, Entrepreneurs, and Activists Are Building an Animal-Free Food System (2018)

Werner von Blomberg photo

“While soldiers were winning victories, so-called labor leaders were engaged in high treason.”

Werner von Blomberg (1878–1946) German field marshal

Quoted in "A History of Militarism: Civilian and Military" - Page 430 - by Alfred Vagts - History - 1967

“Don't go to great trouble to optimize something that never should be done at all. Aim to enhance total systems properties, such as creativity, stability, diversity, resilience, and sustainability–whether they are easily measured or not.”

Kenneth E. Boulding (1910–1993) British-American economist

Attributed to Kenneth Boulding in: Ramage Magnus and Karen Shipp (2009) Systems Thinkers. p. 116
1990s and attributed

John D. Bulkeley photo

“What else could I do? You engage, you fight, you win. That is the reputation of our Navy, then and in the future.”

John D. Bulkeley (1911–1996) United States Navy Medal of Honor recipient

Source: As quoted in 1944, "Namesake USS Bulkeley (DDG 84) https://www.surflant.usff.navy.mil/Organization/Operational-Forces/Destroyers/USS-Bulkeley-DDG-84/About-Us/Namesake/

Stephen Hawking photo

“I still believe there are grounds for cautious optimism that we may now be near the end of the search for the ultimate laws of nature.”

Source: A Brief History of Time (1988), Ch. 11
Context: As I shall describe, the prospects for finding such a theory seem to be much better now because we know so much more about the universe. But we must beware of overconfidence - we have had false dawns before! At the beginning of this century, for example, it was thought that everything could be explained in terms of the properties of continuous matter, such as elasticity and heat conduction. The discovery of atomic structure and the uncertainty principle put an emphatic end to that. Then again, in 1928, physicist and Nobel Prize winner Max Born told a group of visitors to Gottingen University, "Physics, as we know it, will be over in six months." His confidence was based on the recent discovery by Dirac of the equation that governed the electron. It was thought that a similar equation would govern the proton, which was the only other particle known at the time, and that would be the end of theoretical physics. However, the discovery of the neutron and of nuclear forces knocked that one on the head too. Having said this, I still believe there are grounds for cautious optimism that we may now be near the end of the search for the ultimate laws of nature.

Bob Black photo

“An optimal sexual encounter is the paradigm of productive play. The participants potentiate each other's pleasures, nobody keeps score, and everybody wins. The more you give, the more you get.”

The Abolition of Work (1985)
Context: No one can say what would result from unleashing the creative power stultified by work. Anything can happen. The tiresome debater's problem of freedom vs. necessity, with its theological overtones, resolves itself practically once the production of use-values is co-extensive with the consumption of delightful play activity. Life will become a game, or rather many games, but not—as it is now — a zero/sum game. An optimal sexual encounter is the paradigm of productive play. The participants potentiate each other's pleasures, nobody keeps score, and everybody wins. The more you give, the more you get. In the ludic life, the best of sex will diffuse into the better part of daily life. Generalized play leads to the libidinization of life. Sex, in turn, can become less urgent and desperate, more playful.
If we play our cards right, we can all get more out of life than we put into it; but only if we play for keeps.
No one should ever work.
Workers of the world... relax! </center

“The price-tax conditions necessary to sustain the Pareto optimality of a competitive market solution under the assumed convexity conditions are tantamount to standard Pigovian rules, with neither taxes imposed upon, nor compensation paid to, the victims of externalities.”

William J. Baumol (1922–2017) American economist

Source: The theory of environmental policy, 1988, p. 45; Cited in: Vatn, Arild, and Daniel W. Bromley. "Externalities-a market model failure." Environmental and resource economics 9.2 (1997): 135-151.

Related topics