“Everyone had a reason for everything they did, even if that reason was sometimes stupidity.”

—  Karin Slaughter , book Fractured

Source: Fractured

Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Everyone had a reason for everything they did, even if that reason was sometimes stupidity." by Karin Slaughter?
Karin Slaughter photo
Karin Slaughter 5
US-american crime writer 1971

Related quotes

Isaac Asimov photo
Robert A. Heinlein photo

“I sometimes think that my own weakness lies in not realizing the full depths of the weakness and stupidity of men. As a reasonable creature myself I seem to have an unfortunate tendency to expect others unlike myself to be reasonable.”

Robert A. Heinlein (1907–1988) American science fiction author

The Unpleasant Profession of Jonathan Hoag (p. 267)
Short fiction, The Fantasies of Robert A. Heinlein (1999)

Elizabeth Gilbert photo
Steven Erikson photo
Oprah Winfrey photo

“I trust that everything happens for a reason, even if we are not wise enough to see it.”

Oprah Winfrey (1954) American businesswoman, talk show host, actress, producer, and philanthropist

Variant: Everything happens for a reason, even when we are not wise enough to see it. When there is no struggle, there is no strength.

“Even if you do everything a woman wants, it will not be enough. But of course, this is no reason for not doing it.”

Carlos Gershenson (1978) Mexican researcher

Zire Notes (May 2004 - December 2006)

Miguel de Unamuno photo

“Not without reason did he who had the right to do so speak of the foolishness of the cross.”

Miguel de Unamuno (1864–1936) 19th-20th century Spanish writer and philosopher

The Tragic Sense of Life (1913), X : Religion, the Mythology of the Beyond and the Apocatastasis
Context: Not without reason did he who had the right to do so speak of the foolishness of the cross. Foolishness, without a doubt, foolishness. And the American humorist, Oliver Wendell Holmes, was not altogether wide of the mark in making one of the characters in his ingenious conversations say that he thought better of those who were confined in a lunatic asylum on account of religious mania than of those who, while professing the same religious principles, kept their wits and appeared to enjoy life very well outside the asylums. But those who are at large, are they not really, thanks to God, mad too? Are there not mild madnesses, which not only permit us to mix with our neighbors without danger to society, but which rather enable us to do so, for by means of them we are able to attribute a meaning and finality to life and society?

Related topics