Źródło: Tomasz Formicki, Ośmiornica z Kosowa, geopolityka.org, 24 lipca 2012 http://www.geopolityka.org/analizy/1602-osmiornica-z-kosowa
John Mearsheimer cytaty
John Mearsheimer: Cytaty po angielsku
“Preserving power, rather than increasing it, is the main goal of states.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 20
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 2
Preface, p. xi
The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001)
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 6, Great Powers in Action, p. 211
“Decapitation is a fanciful strategy.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 4, The Primacy of Land Power, p. 109
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 10, Great Power Politics in the Twenty First Century, p. 361
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 15
Why China Cannot Rise Peacefully, http://cips.uottawa.ca/event/why-china-cannot-rise-peacefully/
“In the anarchic world of international politics, it is better to be Godzilla than Bambi.”
"China's Unpeaceful Rise", Current History (2006) vol. 105 (690) p. 162
“Bandwagoning is a strategy for the weak.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 5, Strategies for Survival, p. 163
“A state's potential power is based on the size of its population and the level of its wealth.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 2, Anarchy and the Struggle for Power, p. 43
“In an ideal world, where there are only good states, power would be largely irrelevant.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 16
“States have two kinds of power: latent power and military power.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 3, Wealth and Power, p. 55
“China, in short has the potential to be considerably more powerful than even the United States.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 10, Great Power Politics in the Twenty First Century, p. 398
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 6, Great Powers in Action, p. 202
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 8, Balancing versus Buck-Passing, p. 269
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 8, Balancing versus Buck-Passing, p. 293
John Mearsheimer on America Unhinged https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwqqzh59sVo provided by the Center for the National Interest. Here Mearsheimer is speaking about the Syrian conflict and potential United States intervention due to the Assad's regime alleged usage of chemical devices.
“The most dangerous states in the international system are continental powers with large armies.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 4, The Primacy of Land Power, p. 135
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 10, Great Power Politics in the Twenty First Century, p. 385
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 7, The Offshore Balancers, p. 252
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 9, The Causes of Great Power War, p. 337
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 4, The Primacy of Land Power, p. 84
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 4, The Primacy of Land Power, p. 99
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 5, Strategies for Survival, p. 144
“Important benefits often accrue to states that behave in an unexpected way.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 5, Strategies for Survival, p. 166
“Simply put, the most powerful state is the one that prevails in a dispute.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 3, Wealth and Power, p. 57
“States care about relative wealth, because economic might is the foundation of military might.”
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 5, Strategies for Survival, p. 143
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 10, Great Power Politics in the Twenty First Century, p. 371
Źródło: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 8, Balancing versus Buck-Passing, p. 307