Carl Schmitt cytaty

Carl Schmitt – niemiecki prawnik, konstytucjonalista i politolog, specjalista w zakresie nauk o państwie i prawa międzynarodowego, filozof społeczny i teoretyk prawa, teoretyk państwa autorytarnego, zwolennik decyzjonizmu, współtwórca tzw. teologii politycznej.

W latach 1933–1945 członek NSDAP. Wikipedia  

✵ 11. Lipiec 1888 – 7. Kwiecień 1985   •   Natępne imiona Karl Schmitt
Carl Schmitt Fotografia
Carl Schmitt: 43   Cytaty 0   Polubień

Carl Schmitt słynne cytaty

„Ten, kto decyduje o stanie wyjątkowym, jest suwerenny.”

Źródło: Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität, 1922, s. 33.

„Kto mówi ludzkość, ten chce oszukać.”

Źródło: Peter Sloterdijk, Kryształowy pałac. O filozoficzną teorię globalizacji, przeł. Borys Cymbrowski, wyd. Krytyki Politycznej, Warszawa 2011, s. 326.

Carl Schmitt: Cytaty po angielsku

“Sovereign is he who decides on the exception.”

Political Theology (1922), Ch. 1 : Definition of Sovereignty

“A definition of the political can be obtained only by discovering and defining the specifically political categories.”

Carl Schmitt książka The Concept of the Political

The Concept of the Political (1927)

“That the state is an entity and in fact the decisive entity rests upon its political character.”

Carl Schmitt książka The Concept of the Political

The Concept of the Political (1927)

“In a community, the constitution of which provides for a legislator and a law, it is the concern of the legislator and of the laws given by him to ascertain the mediation through calculable and attainable rules and to prevent the terror of the direct and automatic enactment of values. That is a very complicated problem, indeed. One may understand why law-givers all along world history, from Lycurgus to Solon and Napoleon have been turned into mythical figures. In the highly industrialized nations of our times, with their provisions for the organization of the lives of the masses, the mediation would give rise to a new problem. Under the circumstances, there is no room for the law-giver, and so there is no substitute for him. At best, there is only a makeshift which sooner or later is turned into a scapegoat, due to the unthankful role it was given to play.
A jurist who interferes, and wants to become the direct executor of values should know what he is doing. He must recall the origins and the structure of values and dare not treat lightly the problem of the tyranny of values and of the unmediated enactment of values. He must attain a clear understanding of the modern philosophy of values before he decides to become valuator, revaluator, upgrader of values. As a value-carrier and value-sensitive person, he must do that before he goes on to proclaim the positings of a subjective, as well as objective, rank-order of values in the form of pronouncements with the force of law.”

"The Tyranny of Values" (1959)