Paul Ormerod book The Death of Economics
Part II, Chapter 8, The Dynamics of Unemployment, p. 162
The Death of Economics (1994)
De Abaitua interview (1998)
Context: I have a more fractal way of working, if you like, it is more like the way most people’s minds actually work. They don’t work in any linear way. When your mind wanders if you ever pay attention to some of the paths it takes, you generally find it’s these paths of association that can link all over the place. …The movements of the mind don’t follow any linear pattern, they can’t be explained with a mechanistic, clockwork view. You could find quantum models of how the mind works that might fit.
Paul Ormerod book The Death of Economics
Part II, Chapter 8, The Dynamics of Unemployment, p. 162
The Death of Economics (1994)
“Reading is not a straightforward linear movement,”
Terry Eagleton (1943) British writer, academic and educator
Source: 1980s, Literary Theory: An Introduction (1983), Chapter 2, p. 67 (See also: Northrop Frye)
Context: Reading is not a straightforward linear movement, a merely cumulative affair: our initial speculations generate a frame of reference within which to interpret what comes next, but what comes next may retrospectively transform our original understanding, highlighting some features of it and backgrounding others.
“Nothing is less forgiven than setting Patterns Men have no mind to follow.”
George Savile, 1st Marquess of Halifax (1633–1695) English politician
Princes (their Rewards of Servants).
Political, Moral, and Miscellaneous Reflections (1750), Political Thoughts and Reflections
Maimónides book The Guide for the Perplexed
Source: Guide for the Perplexed (c. 1190), Part III, Ch.25
Walter Terence Stace (1886–1967) British civil servant, educator and philosopher.
Gregory Benford (1941) Science fiction author and astrophysicist
Part 2 “Aleph”, Chapter 3 (p. 68)
Against Infinity (1983)