“There is no single rule that governs the use of geometry. I don't think that one exists.”

New Scientist interview (2004)

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "There is no single rule that governs the use of geometry. I don't think that one exists." by Benoît Mandelbrot?
Benoît Mandelbrot photo
Benoît Mandelbrot 56
Polish-born, French and American mathematician 1924–2010

Related quotes

David Rockefeller photo
Jesse Ventura photo
Hans Reichenbach photo
Geoffrey West photo

“I’ve always wanted to find the rules that govern everything. It’s amazing that such rules exist. It’s even more amazing that we can find them.”

Geoffrey West (1940) British physicist

2010s
Source: Jonah Lehredec. " A Physicist Solves the City http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/magazine/19Urban_West-t.html?pagewanted=5&_r=1," in www.nytimes.com. Dec 17, 2010.

Enrico Fermi photo

“I cannot think of a single one, not even intelligence.”

Enrico Fermi (1901–1954) Italian physicist

When asked what characteristics Nobel prize winning physicists had in common. As quoted in Physics Today (October 1994), p. 70.

Blaise Pascal photo

“Logic has borrowed, perhaps, the rules of geometry, without comprehending their force”

Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) French mathematician, physicist, inventor, writer, and Christian philosopher

The Art of Persuasion
Context: Logic has borrowed, perhaps, the rules of geometry, without comprehending their force... it does not thence follow that they have entered into the spirit of geometry, and I should be greatly averse... to placing them on a level with that science that teaches the true method of directing reason.

Nicomachus photo

“If geometry exists, arithmetic must also needs be implied”

Nicomachus (60–120) Ancient Greek mathematician

Nicomachus of Gerasa: Introduction to Arithmetic (1926)
Context: If geometry exists, arithmetic must also needs be implied... But on the contrary 3, 4, and the rest might be 5 without the figures existing to which they give names. Hence arithmetic abolishes geometry along with itself, but is not abolished by it, and while it is implied by geometry, it does not itself imply geometry.<!--Book I, Chapter IV

Stephen Harper photo

Related topics