“Elegance is woman: it bears your name.”
Prevale (1983) Italian DJ and producer
Original: (it) L'eleganza è donna: porta il tuo nome.
Source: prevale.net
The Speaker (15 December 1900)
“Elegance is woman: it bears your name.”
Prevale (1983) Italian DJ and producer
Original: (it) L'eleganza è donna: porta il tuo nome.
Source: prevale.net
Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924) American politician, 28th president of the United States (in office from 1913 to 1921)
Message to the Senate (19 August 1914)
1910s
“He said that there was one only good, namely, knowledge; and one only evil, namely, ignorance.”
Diogenes Laërtius (180–240) biographer of ancient Greek philosophers
Socrates, 14.
The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers (c. 200 A.D.), Book 2: Socrates, his predecessors and followers
Arnold Bennett (1867–1931) English novelist
Source: How to Live on Twenty-Four Hours a Day (1910), Chapter 12.
Leslie Stephen (1832–1904) British author, literary critic, and first editor of the Dictionary of National Biography
The Cornhill Magazine, vol. 33 (1876) p. 574
Chuck Dixon (1954) American comic book writer
Interview: Chuck Dixon http://www.gothamwdeszczu.com.pl/en/2013/07/04/interview-chuck-dixon/ (July 4, 2013)
“To understand a name you must be acquainted with the particular of which it is a name.”
Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) logician, one of the first analytic philosophers and political activist
1910s, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism (1918)
“Where a man calls himself by a name which is not his name, he is telling a falsehood.”
William Brett, 1st Viscount Esher (1815–1899) British lawyer, judge and politician
Reddaway v. Banham (1895), L. R. 2 Q. B. D. [1895], p. 293.
“Perfection and imperfection are names which do not differ much from the names beauty and ugliness.”
Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677) Dutch philosopher
Letter to Hugo Boxel (Oct. 1674) The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza (1891) Tr. R. H. M. Elwes, Vol. 2, Letter 58 (54).
Context: Beauty, my dear Sir, is not so much a quality of the object beheld, as an effect in him who beholds it. If our sight were longer or shorter, or if our constitution were different, what now appears beautiful to us would seem misshapen, and what we now think misshapen we should regard as beautiful. The most beautiful hand seen through the microscope will appear horrible. Some things are beautiful at a distance, but ugly near; thus things regarded in themselves, and in relation to God, are neither ugly nor beautiful. Therefore, he who says that God has created the world, so that it might be beautiful, is bound to adopt one of the two alternatives, either that God created the world for the sake of men's pleasure and eyesight, or else that He created men's pleasure and eyesight for the sake of the world. Now, whether we adopt the former or the latter of these views, how God could have furthered His object by the creation of ghosts, I cannot see. Perfection and imperfection are names which do not differ much from the names beauty and ugliness.<!--p. 382