1790s, The Age of Reason, Part II (1795)
“Whatever can be proved to be good, must be so by being shown to be a means to something admitted to be good without proof.”
—
John Stuart Mill
,
book
Utilitarianism
Source: Utilitarianism (1861), Ch. 1
Context: I shall, without further discussion of the other theories, attempt to contribute something towards the understanding and appreciation of the Utilitarian or Happiness theory, and towards such proof as it is susceptible of. It is evident that this cannot be proof in the ordinary and popular meaning of the term. Questions of ultimate ends are not amenable to direct proof. Whatever can be proved to be good, must be so by being shown to be a means to something admitted to be good without proof.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Do you have more details about the quote "Whatever can be proved to be good, must be so by being shown to be a means to something admitted to be good without pro…" by John Stuart Mill?
John Stuart Mill 179
British philosopher and political economist 1806–1873Related quotes
Source: Utilitarianism (1861), Ch. 1
“Must admit it felt good. First time in years anybody ever admitted I was right.”
Gregory Benford
(1941) Science fiction author and astrophysicist
To the Storming Gulf, p. 142
In Alien Flesh (1986)
Pete Doherty
(1979) English musician, writer, actor, poet and artist
May 2009, latest news
Oasis (band)
“Human beings are not very good at taking losses or admitting failure.”
William J. Bernstein
(1948) economist
Source: The Four Pillars of Investing (2002), Chapter 7, Misbehavior, p. 177.
Source: First Things First (1994), p. 113
Context: It's not enough to have values without vision; you want to be good, but you want to be good for something. On the other hand, vision without values can create a Hitler. An empowering mission statement deals with both character and competence; what you want to be and what you want to do in your life.
Source: Guide for the Perplexed (c. 1190), Part III, Ch.21
Context: He fully knows His unchangeable essence, and has thus a knowledge of all that results from any of His acts. If we were to try to understand in what manner this is done, it would be the same as if we tried to be the same as God, and to make our knowledge identical with His knowledge. Those who seek the truth, and admit what is true, must believe that nothing is hidden from God; that everything is revealed to His knowledge, which is identical with His essence; that this kind of knowledge cannot be comprehended by us; for if we knew its method, we would possess that intellect by which such knowledge could be acquired.... Note this well, for I think that this is an excellent idea, and leads to correct views; no error will be found in it; no dialectical argument; it does not lead to any absurd conclusion, nor to ascribing any defect to God. These sublime and profound themes admit of no proof whatever... In all questions that cannot be demonstrated, we must adopt the method which we have adopted in this question about God's Omniscience. Note it.