
Source: 1980s, Laws of Media: The New Science (with Eric McLuhan) (1988), p. 227
Source: 1980s, Laws of Media: The New Science (with Eric McLuhan) (1988), p. 127
Source: 1980s, Laws of Media: The New Science (with Eric McLuhan) (1988), p. 227
Source: 1980s, Laws of Media: The New Science (with Eric McLuhan) (1988), p. 99
Source: 1980s, Laws of Media: The New Science (with Eric McLuhan) (1988), p. 37
Source: 1990s and beyond, The Book of Probes : Marshall McLuhan (2011), p. 227
God doesn't believe in atheists (2002)
“The space of early Greek cosmology was structured by logos – resonant utterance or word.”
Source: 1980s, Laws of Media: The New Science (with Eric McLuhan) (1988), p. 35
“Divinity was revealed in humanity; the invisible glory in the visible human form.”
Ch. 1 http://www.egwtext.whiteestate.org/col/col1.html, p. 17
Christ's Object Lessons (1900)
Context: In Christ's parable teaching the same principle is seen as in His own mission to the world. That we might become acquainted with His divine character and life, Christ took our nature and dwelt among us. Divinity was revealed in humanity; the invisible glory in the visible human form. Men could learn of the unknown through the known; heavenly things were revealed through the earthly; God was made manifest in the likeness of men. So it was in Christ's teaching: the unknown was illustrated by the known; divine truths by earthly things with which the people were most familiar.
Source: The Politics of Experience (1967), Ch. 1 : Experience as evidence
Context: I cannot experience your experience. You cannot experience my experience. We are both invisible men. All men are invisible to one another. Experience used to be called The Soul. Experience as invisibility of man to man is at the same time more evident than anything. Only experience is evident. Experience is the only evidence. Psychology is the logos of experience. Psychology is the structure of the evidence, and hence psychology is the science of sciences.
Source: Chemistry as an Interesting Subject for the Philosophy of Science, 2001, p. 192
Source: Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation, 1957, p. 8