Tigran Petrosian (1929–1984) Soviet Georgian Armenian chess player and chess writer
Attributed without citation in "Tigran Petrosian's Best Games" http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1014968 at chessgames.com
Opening Gambit, Why Chess?, p. 4
2000s, How Life Imitates Chess (2007)
Tigran Petrosian (1929–1984) Soviet Georgian Armenian chess player and chess writer
Attributed without citation in "Tigran Petrosian's Best Games" http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1014968 at chessgames.com
Marcel Duchamp (1887–1968) French painter and sculptor
Quote from 'Time Magazine', 10 March 1952; as quoted on Wikipedia: Marcel Duchamp
1951 - 1968
Ashot Nadanian (1972) chess player
S'pore Chess News, 7 September 2010 http://www.singaporechessnews.com/reflections_1.html
Zygmunt Vetulani (1950) Polish mathematician
Tumiłowicz, Bronisław (February 2018): Zrób sobie mózg https://www.tygodnikprzeglad.pl/zrob-sobie-mozg/. Przegląd (6/2018): pp. 58–59.
Alexander Alekhine (1892–1946) Russian / French chess player, chess writer, and chess theoretician
Quoted in: Daniel James Brooks (2013) Poetics. Book 1, p. 72.
Roger Wolcott Sperry (1913–1994) American neuroscientist
New Mindset on Consciousness (1987)
Context: Instead of maintaining the traditional separation of science and values, cognitive theory says the two come together in brain function. If we are correct in saying that our conscious mental values not only arise from, but also influence brain processing, then it becomes possible to integrate values with the physical world on a scientific rather than supernatural basis. It's been the traditional role of religion to affirm the primary importance of our higher values in this world by invoking a supreme power. In cognitivism, it is science that affirms the powerful controlling role of higher values, and it is able to do so on grounds that are verifiable — that is, testable against reality as it really is.
On these new terms, science no longer upholds a value-empty existence, in which everything, including the human mind, is driven entirely by strictly physical forces of the most elemental kind. We get a vastly revised answer to the old question "What does science leave to believe in?" that gives us a different image of science and the kind of truth science stands for. This new outlook leads to realistic, this world values that provide a strong moral basis for environmentalism and population controls and for policies that would protect the long-term evolving quality of the biosphere.