The portion after the second semicolon is widely paraphrased or misquoted. Two examples are "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong" and "There is always an easy solution to every human problem -- neat, plausible, and wrong."
1910s
Source: "The Divine Afflatus" in New York Evening Mail (16 November 1917); later published in Prejudices: Second Series (1920) and A Mencken Chrestomathy (1949)
“When it comes to the all-too-human problem of recessions and depressions, economists need to abandon the neat but wrong solution of assuming that everyone is rational and markets work perfectly. The vision that emerges as the profession rethinks its foundations may not be all that clear; it certainly won’t be neat; but we can hope that it will have the virtue of being at least partly right.”
"How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?", The New York Times (September 2, 2009)
The New York Times Columns
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Paul Krugman 106
American economist 1953Related quotes
Source: Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality (The El Farol Problem) (1994), p. 1
Inflation vs. Unemployment, An Address by the Honourable Paul T. Hellyer, Curran Hall Limited, Toronto, February 20th, 1958
Undated
Source: Conversation with Prem Rawat The Prem Rawat Foundation
As quoted in The Issue at Hand: Studies in Contemporary Magazine Science Fiction (1964) by James Blish, p. 14
N. Gregory Mankiw, "What Would Keynes Have Done?" in New York Times (November 28, 2008).
2000s -
Michael Halliday (1987) cited in: Margaret Laing, Keith Williamson (1994) Speaking in Our Tongues. p. 99.
1970s and later