
Source: Reminiscences (1964), p. 417
Speech at New York Press Club (9 September 1912), in The papers of Woodrow Wilson, 25:124
1910s
Source: Reminiscences (1964), p. 417
“The history of liberty has largely been the history of the observance of procedural safeguards.”
Writing for the court, McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943).
Judicial opinions
2000s, 2005, Second Inaugural Address (January 2005)
1920s, Unveiling of Equestrian Statue of Bishop Francis Asbury, (Oct. 15, 1924)
Source: The Great Seesaw: A New View of the Western World, 1750-2000 (1988)
Commonly quoted on many websites, this quotation is actually from an address by President Gerald Ford to the US Congress (12 August 1974) http://www.bartleby.com/73/714.html
Misattributed
2000s, 2003, Address to the National Endowment for Democracy (November 2003)
20 July 1848
Journal Intime (1882), Journal entries
Obergefell v. Hodges http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf (26 June 2015).
2010s
Context: The Court's decision today is at odds not only with the constitution, but with the principles upon which our Nation was built. Since well before 1787, liberty has been understood as freedom from government action, not entitlement to government benefits. The framers created our constitution to preserve that understanding of liberty. Yet the majority invokes our Constitution in the name of a 'liberty' that the framers would not have recognized, to the detriment of the liberty they sought to protect. Along the way, it rejects the idea—captured in our Declaration of Independence—that human dignity is innate and suggests instead that it comes from the Government. This distortion of our Constitution not only ignores the text, it inverts the relationship between the individual and the state in our Republic. I cannot agree with it.