“By a small sample we may judge of the whole piece.”

Source: Don Quixote de la Mancha (1605–1615), Part I, Book I, Ch. 4.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "By a small sample we may judge of the whole piece." by Miguel de Cervantes?
Miguel de Cervantes photo
Miguel de Cervantes 178
Spanish novelist, poet, and playwright 1547–1616

Related quotes

Andrew Sega photo
Hermann Weyl photo

“This letter, if judged by the novelty and profundity of ideas it contains, is perhaps the most substantial piece of writing in the whole literature of mankind.”

Hermann Weyl (1885–1955) German mathematician

Symmetry (1952) (quote on p. 138; referring to a letter by Évariste Galois to Auguste Chevalier from May 29, 1832, two days before Galois’ death, containing a testamentary summary of Galois’ discoveries)

“When the sample size is small or the study is of one organization, descriptive use of the thematic coding is desirable.”

Richard Boyatzis (1946) American business theorist

Source: Transforming qualitative information (1998), p. 129.

A.A. Milne photo

“I am not in the least forbidden. You may sample me all you choose.”

Lora Leigh (1965) American writer

Source: Wicked Pleasure

Ronald Fisher photo
James A. Garfield photo

“I am trying to do two things: dare to be a radical and not be a fool, which, if I may judge by the exhibitions around me, is a matter of no small difficulty.”

James A. Garfield (1831–1881) American politician, 20th President of the United States (in office in 1881)

In a letter to Burke Aaron Hinsdale (1 January 1867); quoted in The Life of Gen. James A. Garfield (1880) by Jonas Mills Bundy, p. 77
1860s

Oliver Lodge photo
G. K. Chesterton photo

“It searched for truth not by synthesis but by subdivision. It not only broke religion into small pieces, but it was bound to choose the smallest piece.”

"Fads and Public Opinion"
What I Saw in America (1922)
Context: The truth is that prohibitions might have done far less harm as prohibitions, if a vague association had not arisen, on some dark day of human unreason, between prohibition and progress. And it was the progress that did the harm, not the prohibition. Men can enjoy life under considerable limitations, if they can be sure of their limited enjoyments; but under Progressive Puritanism we can never be sure of anything. The curse of it is not limitation; it is unlimited limitation. The evil is not in the restriction; but in the fact that nothing can ever restrict the restriction. The prohibitions are bound to progress point by point; more and more human rights and pleasures must of necessity be taken away; for it is of the nature of this futurism that the latest fad is the faith of the future, and the most fantastic fad inevitably makes the pace. Thus the worst thing in the seventeenth-century aberration was not so much Puritanism as sectarianism. It searched for truth not by synthesis but by subdivision. It not only broke religion into small pieces, but it was bound to choose the smallest piece.

Pericles photo

“Although only a few may originate a policy, we are all able to judge it.”

Pericles (-494–-429 BC) Greek statesman, orator, and general of Athens

As quoted in The Open Society and Its Enemies by Karl Popper (1966). Book II, chapter 40.

Related topics