“Even the Gods cannot strive against necessity.”

— Pittacus of Mytilene

As quoted by Plato, Protagoras, 345d, and by Diogenes Laërtius, i. 77.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Even the Gods cannot strive against necessity." by Pittacus of Mytilene?

Pittacus of Mytilene11

Greek sage

Related quotes

“One of his sayings was, "Even the gods cannot strive against necessity."”

Diogenes Laërtius (180–240) biographer of ancient Greek philosophers

Pittacus, 4.
The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers (c. 200 A.D.), Book 1: The Seven Sages

“Not even the gods fight against necessity.”

Simonides of Ceos (-556–-468 BC) Ancient Greek musician and poet

Quoted by Plato in the dialogue Protagoras, 345d http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0177%3Atext%3DProt.%3Asection%3D345d (Simonides Fr. 37.1.27 ff.). <br class="br">Variant translations: <br class="br">The gods do not fight against necessity. <br class="br">Not even the gods war against necessity. <br class="br">I praise and love all men who do no sin willingly; but with necessity even the gods do not contend.

“I hold that mortal foolish who strives against the stress of necessity.”

Euripidés (-480–-406 BC) ancient Athenian playwright

Hercules Furens l. 281

“For there is no one so great or mighty that he can avoid the misery that will rise up against him when he resists and strives against God”

John Calvin (1509–1564) French Protestant reformer

“Art is not science. Even when art is about science, it is still art. There cannot be consensus, in the sense that science strives for meaningful consensus.”

Caitlín R. Kiernan (1964) writer

(15 June 2007)
Unfit for Mass Consumption (blog entries), 2007
Context: Art is not science. Even when art is about science, it is still art. There cannot be consensus, in the sense that science strives for meaningful consensus. And unlike science, art is not progressive. Personally, I have my doubts that science can be said to be genuinely progressive, but I'm pretty dammed certain that art is not. Which is not to say that it is not accumulative or accretionary. But the belief that sf writers are out there forecasting the future, that they have some social responsibility to do so, that's malarky, if you ask me. Writers of sf can only, at best, make educated guesses, and usually those guesses are wrong, and clumping together to form a consensus does not in any way insure against history unfolding in one of those other, unpredicted directions. People love to pick out the occasional instances where Jules Verne and William Gibson got it right; they rarely ever point fingers at their miscalls.