
"Wrong? Dvorak blames his 'getting screwed over' by Apple" in NetworkWorld (27 June 2012) http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/wrong-dvorak-blames-getting-screwed-over-apple
2010s
"Wrong? Dvorak blames his 'getting screwed over' by Apple" in NetworkWorld (27 June 2012) http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/wrong-dvorak-blames-getting-screwed-over-apple
2010s
“Once positioned on their(children's) lips,
even the scariest of words
come out as a melodious lisp.”
<span class="plainlinks"> Children http://www.occupypoetry.net/children_1/</span>
From Poetry
22 U.S. (9 Wheaton) 1, 188
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Os Brâmanes, p. 147
Os Brâmanes (1866)
"Robert Anton Wilson on Wilhelm Reich" (March 1995)
Context: He {Wilhelm Reich} had a great capacity to arouse irrational hatred obviously, and that's because his ideas were radical in the most extreme sense of the word "radical." His ideas have something to offend everybody, and he ended up becoming the only heretic in American history whose books were literally burned by the government.
Timothy Leary spent five years in prison for unorthodox scientific ideas. Ezra Pound spent 13 years in a nuthouse for unorthodox political and economic ideas. Their books were not burned.
Reich was not only thrown in prison, but they chopped up all the scientific equipment in his laboratory with axes and burned all of his books in an incinerator. Now that interests me as a civil liberties issue.
When I started studying Reich's works, I went through a period of enthusiasm, followed by a period of skepticism, followed by a period of just continued interest, but I think a lot of his ideas probably were sound. A lot probably were unsound. And, I'm not a Reichian in the sense of somebody who thinks he was the greatest scientist who ever lived and discovered the basic secrets of psychology, physics and everything else, all in one lifetime. But I think he has enough sound ideas that his unpopular ideas deserve further investigation.
The Vorkosigan Companion (2008)
Context: Reading is an active and elusive experience. Every reader, reading exactly the same text, will have a slightly different reading experience depending on what s/he projects into the words s/he sees, what strings of meaning and association those words call up in his/her (always) private mind. One can never therefore, talk about the quality of a book separately from the quality of the mind that is creating it by reading it, in the only place books live, in the secret mind.
"'A Conversation With Lois McMaster Bujold", an interview with Lillian Stewart Carl, p. 52
Source: A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God (1908), I