“Nothing is perfect. Flaws are interesting. Be the tree.”

Source: Speak

Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Nothing is perfect. Flaws are interesting. Be the tree." by Laurie Halse Anderson?
Laurie Halse Anderson photo
Laurie Halse Anderson 147
American children's writer 1961

Related quotes

Laurie Halse Anderson photo
Alice Walker photo
Jodi Picoult photo

“I think her flaws make me love her even more. She's not perfect, but she's perfect to me”

Jodi Picoult (1966) Author

Source: Between the Lines

Patrick Rothfuss photo

“Who wants to be a goddess when we can be human? Perfection is a flaw disguised as control.”

Terry Tempest Williams (1955) American writer

Source: When Women Were Birds: Fifty-four Variations on Voice

“Flawed, we're truly interesting, truly memorable, and yes, truly beautiful.”

Justina Chen (1968) American writer

Source: North of Beautiful

John Seigenthaler photo

“I am interested in letting many people know that Wikipedia is a flawed and irresponsible research tool.”

Op-Ed Piece: "A false Wikipedia 'biography'" http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm, USA Today (29 November 2005)

Daniel Dennett photo

“The methods of science aren't foolproof, but they are indefinitely perfectible. Just as important: there is a tradition of criticism that enforces improvement whenever and wherever flaws are discovered.”

Daniel Dennett (1942) American philosopher

Postmodernism and truth (1998)
Context: The methods of science aren't foolproof, but they are indefinitely perfectible. Just as important: there is a tradition of criticism that enforces improvement whenever and wherever flaws are discovered. The methods of science, like everything else under the sun, are themselves objects of scientific scrutiny, as method becomes methodology, the analysis of methods. Methodology in turn falls under the gaze of epistemology, the investigation of investigation itself — nothing is off limits to scientific questioning. The irony is that these fruits of scientific reflection, showing us the ineliminable smudges of imperfection, are sometimes used by those who are suspicious of science as their grounds for denying it a privileged status in the truth-seeking department — as if the institutions and practices they see competing with it were no worse off in these regards. But where are the examples of religious orthodoxy being simply abandoned in the face of irresistible evidence? Again and again in science, yesterday's heresies have become today's new orthodoxies. No religion exhibits that pattern in its history.

Related topics