John Eardley Wilmot: In-Laws

John Eardley Wilmot was English judge. Explore interesting quotes on in-laws.
John Eardley Wilmot: 44 quotes0 likes

“You all very well know what deference I always pay, and ever will, to that part of the office of a jury which properly belongs to them. In regard to the law, I have always been as tenacious of the proper function of a Judge, as I have been of that of the jury. I never will, while I have the honour of executing the office of a Judge, attempt to controul or influence their minds in respect of damages; but only submit to them such observations as occur to me upon the evidence.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Wilkes v. Lord Halifax (1763), 19 How. St. Tr. 1410.

“I am not for stirring a single pebble of the common law.”

John Eardley Wilmot

2 Wils. 341.
Collins v. Blantern (1767)

“The statute law is the will of the legislature in writing; the common law is nothing else but statutes worn out by time; all our law began by consent of the legislature, and whether it is now law by usage or writing, it is the same thing.”

John Eardley Wilmot

2 Wils. 341.
Collins v. Blantern (1767)

“A course of precedents and judicial proceedings in Courts of justice make the law: it would be endless to cite cases upon it. A course of practice for a few years has been held to controul an Act of Parliament.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Wilkes' Case (1770), 19 How. St. Tr. 1130.

“Settlements are supposed in law to be indifferent to paupers; though they are often in fact desirous of one in preference to another.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Rex v. Inhabitants of Burton-Bradstock (1765), Burrow (Settlement Cases), 535.

“I have always thought that formerly there was too confined a way of thinking in the Judges of the common law Courts, and that Courts of equity have risen by the Judges not properly applying the principles of the common law, being too narrowly governed by old cases and maxims, which have too much prevented the public from having the benefit of the common law.”

John Eardley Wilmot

2 Wils. 341.
Collins v. Blantern (1767)

“These laws must be construed according to the intention of them: and the circumstances of things at the time of enacting them ought to be taken into consideration.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Rex v. Inhabitants of Burton-Bradstock (1765), Burrow (Settlement Cases), 536.

“The manner of the transaction was to gild over and conceal the truth; and whenever Courts of law see such attempts made to conceal such wicked deeds they will brush away the cobweb varnish and show the transactions in their true light.”

John Eardley Wilmot

2 Wils. 349.
Collins v. Blantern (1767)

“An hiatus in government is so detested and abhorred, that the law says, "the King never dies," that there may never be a "cesser" of regal functions for a moment.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Case of John Wilkes (1763), 19 How. St. Tr. 1130.

“There is no merit in a settlement: it depends upon positive law.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Rex v. Corporation of Carmarthen (1759), 2 Burr. Part IV. 873.

“I cannot help thinking that where a person appeals to the Law of England, he must take his remedy according to the Law of England to which he has appealed.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Robinson v. Bland (1760), 2 Burr. Part IV. 1084.

“It is the principle of the common law, that an officer ought not to take money for doing his duty.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Stotesbury v. Smith (1759), 2 Burr. Part IV. 928.

“It is a strange, wild jurisdiction, where the jurors are judges both of law and fact, and ignorant country fellows2 are to determine the nicest points of law.”

John Eardley Wilmot

Doe v. Roe (1760), 2 Burr. Part IV. 1047.

“You shall not stipulate for iniquity. All writers upon our law agree in this, no polluted hand shall touch the pure fountains of justice.”

John Eardley Wilmot

2 Wils. 341.
Collins v. Blantern (1767)