G. L. S. Shackle Quotes

George Lennox Sharman Shackle was an English economist. He made a practical attempt to challenge classical rational choice theory and has been characterised as a "post-Keynesian", though he is influenced as well by Austrian economics. Much of his work is associated with the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence.

Wikipedia

✵ 14. July 1903 – 3. March 1992

G. L. S. Shackle: 8 quotes0 likes

Famous G. L. S. Shackle Quotes

“When we examine this suggestion, we see that it is no more than a formal acknowledgement of a problem, the problem of how (by what institutional arrangement, by what organization of affairs) the equilibrium prices are to be discovered. Repeated trial and error, while the market stands in suspense awaiting the outcome, is not a practical resort. The number of distinct trials, even if confined to discrete steps of price and quantity, would be so immense that the necessary 'market day' would extend beyond human life-times… [The] theoretical ideal applies to mutually isolated days or moments, each to be treated as perfectly self-contained and looking to no yesterday and no tomorrow. But the real market is dealing with goods inherited from yesterday, and in means of production whose products will not be ready till tomorrow. Meanwhile the non-economic circumstances are changing and rendering each successive equilibrium obsolete.”

G. L. S. Shackle

Source: Epistemics and Economics. (1972), p. 150

“Myrdalian ex ante language would have saved the General Theory from describing the flow of investment and the flow of saving as identically, tautologically equal, and within the same discourse, treating their equality as a condition which may, or not, be fulfilled”

G. L. S. Shackle

G. L. S. Shackle (1989) "What did the General Theory do?", in J. Pheby (ed), New Directions in Post-keynesian Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

“Whatever form it takes, the possession of the imaginative gift transforms the problem of accounting for human conduct. For now it is not a question of how given needs are satisfied. Deliberative conduct, choice, the prime economic act, depend for their possibility, when they go beyond pure instinctive animal response to stimulus, upon the conceptual power of the human mind. Choice is necessarily amongst thoughts, amongst things imagined.”

G. L. S. Shackle

Source: Epistemics and Economics. (1972), p. 130

“Before the Treatise, the interest- rate was determined by tastes and objective circumstances, by the persuasibility of income-earners to transfer consumption from the present to the future, and the desire of business men to transfer the means of free enterprise from the future to the present, thus altering the productive possibilities and enlarging the prospective income of the society including themselves.”

G. L. S. Shackle

Source: Epistemics and Economics. (1972), p. 162

“The bond price, and, as an arithmetical and rigid consequence, the interest rate is an inherently restless variable.”

G. L. S. Shackle

Source: Epistemics and Economics. (1972), p. 201

“In the Treatise we are shown the bond-market as it exists in real life: a speculative market where a price, with an identity and a momentary stability, can only exist if there are two camps of dealers holding opposite views of the impending movement of bond prices.”

G. L. S. Shackle

Source: Epistemics and Economics. (1972), p. 162

“A discipline, a region of the world of thought, should seek to know itself. Like an individual human being, it has received from its origins a stamp of character, a native mode of response to the situations confronting it. Right responses, 'responsibility', will require of the profession as of the individual an insight into the powers and defects of the tool which history has bequeathed to it.”

G. L. S. Shackle

Source: Epistemics and Economics. (1972), p. 24

“There is little point in demanding minor concessions and relaxations of the abstract, timeless general equilibrium. The light it can throw on human affairs is throw by its most austere and formal version. We are not concerned to ask: How could it possibly work? The useful question is: What does its logical structure imply?”

G. L. S. Shackle

Source: Epistemics and Economics. (1972), p. 150-1

Similar authors

John Hicks photo

John Hicks14

British economist None

John Maynard Keynes photo

John Maynard Keynes122

British economist None

Ronald H. Coase photo

Ronald H. Coase19

British economist and author None

Bertil Ohlin photo

Bertil Ohlin11

Swedish economist and politician None

Jan Tinbergen photo

Jan Tinbergen21

Dutch economist None

Thomas J. Sargent photo

Thomas J. Sargent10

American economist None

Paul A. Samuelson photo

Paul A. Samuelson47

American economist None

Milton Friedman photo

Milton Friedman158

American economist, statistician, and writer None

Theodore Schultz photo

Theodore Schultz15

American economist None

Douglass C. North photo

Douglass C. North18

American Economist None