Ray Kurzweil (1948) Author, scientist, inventor, and futurist
Futurist Ray Kurweil Bring Dead Father Back to Life http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/futurist-ray-kurzweil-bring-dead-father-back-life/story?id=14267712 (2011)
“The major downside of democracy is that even the least critical minds will never think they are wrong.”
Last update Dec. 28, 2023. History
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Do you have more details about the quote "The major downside of democracy is that even the least critical minds will never think they are wrong." by Mwanandeke Kindembo?
Mwanandeke Kindembo1044
Congolese author 1996Related quotes
“It's wrong to criticize leaders of the church, even if the criticism is true.”
Dallin H. Oaks (1932) Apostle of the LDs Church
Part Two Transcript http://www.pbs.org/mormons/etc/script2.html, The Mormons, Dallin H. Oaks, 2007
K. R. Narayanan (1920–2005) 9th Vice President and the 10th President of India
Shri K. R. Narayanan President of India in Conversation with N. Ram on Doordarshan and All India Radio
Francis Escudero (1969) Filipino politician
"Who's afraid of People Power", Philippine Graphic, 31 January 2005, p. 28, ISSN 119-206X.
2005
Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) Italian philosopher, mathematician and astronomer
Included as a quotation in The Great Quotations (1977) by George Seldes, p. 35, this appears to be a paraphrase of a summation of arguments of Bruno's speech in a debate at the College of Cambray (25 May 1588) which are not clearly presented as a direct translation of his statements:
: In an inspired speech Bruno, through the interpreter, Jean Hennequin, of Paris, declared the discovery of numberless worlds in the One Infinite Universe. Nothing was more deplorable, declared he, than the habit of blind belief, for of all other things it hinders the mind from recognizing such matters as are in themselves clear and open. It was proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people. However, he cautioned that they should not be influenced by the fervor of speech, but by the weight of his argument and the majesty of truth.
:* Coulson Turnbull in Life and Teachings of Giordano Bruno : Philosopher, Martyr, Mystic 1548 — 1600 (1913), p. 41
Disputed
“In a democracy, thumping majorities prevail.”
Ilana Mercer South African writer
“Planet Facebook Owns It,” http://www.ilanamercer.com/phprunner/public_article_list_view.php?editid1=652 WorldNetDaily.com, May 25, 2012. <br class="br">2010s, 2012
James E. Lovelock (1919) independent scientist, environmentalist and futurist
Interview with The Guardian (29 March 2010)
Pope Benedict XVI (1927) 265th Pope of the Catholic Church
The Public Square, by Richard John Neuhaus, First Things 1996
1990s
Alan Turing Computing Machinery and Intelligence
Source: Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950), p. 454.
Context: Another simile would be an atomic pile of less than critical size: an injected idea is to correspond to a neutron entering the pile from without. Each such neutron will cause a certain disturbance which eventually dies away. If, however, the size of the pile is sufficiently increased, the disturbance caused by such an incoming neutron will very likely go on and on increasing until the whole pile is destroyed. Is there a corresponding phenomenon for minds, and is there one for machines? There does seem to be one for the human mind. The majority of them seem to be "sub-critical," i. e., to correspond in this analogy to piles of sub-critical size. An idea presented to such a mind will on average give rise to less than one idea in reply. A smallish proportion are super-critical. An idea presented to such a mind may give rise to a whole "theory" consisting of secondary, tertiary and more remote ideas. Animals minds seem to be very definitely sub-critical. Adhering to this analogy we ask, "Can a machine be made to be super-critical?"