“I was very interested in the Great War, as it was called then, because it was the initial twentieth-century shock to European culture.”
Humanities interview (1996)
Context: I was very interested in the Great War, as it was called then, because it was the initial twentieth-century shock to European culture. By the time we got to the Second World War, everybody was more or less used to Europe being badly treated and people being killed in multitudes. The Great War introduced those themes to Western culture, and therefore it was an immense intellectual and cultural and social shock.
Robert Sherwood, who used to write speeches for Franklin D. Roosevelt, once noted that the cynicism about the Second War began before the firing of the first shot. By that time, we didn't need to be told by people like Remarque and Siegfried Sassoon how nasty war was. We knew that already, and we just had to pursue it in a sort of controlled despair. It didn't have the ironic shock value of the Great War.
And I chose to write about Britain because America was in that war a very, very little time compared to the British — just a few months, actually. The British were in it for four years, and it virtually destroyed British society.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Paul Fussell 15
Recipient of the Purple Heart medal 1924–2012Related quotes

Don Tarquinio (1905; repr. London: Chatto and Windus, 1941), Prologue, p. x

Source: [Pope John Paul II, 2005, Memory and identity: conversations at the dawn of a millennium, Rizzoli]

R. G. Collingwood (1937), as cited in: Patrick Suppes (1973), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: Proceedings.
Source: The Dialectic of Sex (1970), Chapter Four

Source: 1960s, The Gutenberg Galaxy (1962), p. 51

2000s, The Real Abraham Lincoln: A Debate (2002), Q&A