“The existing scientific concepts cover always only a very limited part of reality, and the other part that has not yet been understood is infinite.”

—  Werner Heisenberg

Physics and Philosophy (1958), p. 201

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update March 31, 2024. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "The existing scientific concepts cover always only a very limited part of reality, and the other part that has not yet …" by Werner Heisenberg?
Werner Heisenberg photo
Werner Heisenberg 42
German theoretical physicist 1901–1976

Related quotes

Victor Hugo photo

“The infinite exists. It is there. If the infinite had nothewould be its limit; it would not be the infinite; in other words, it would not be. But it is. Then it has aThisof the infinite is God.”

Victor Hugo book Les Misérables

Source: Les Misérables

Antoni Tàpies photo

“The tattoo can only exist as part of the skin, as a drawing always is an incision in the material and therefore cannot be parted from it.”

Antoni Tàpies (1923–2012) Catalan painter, sculptor and art theorist

Source: undated quotes, Tàpies, Werke auf Papier 1943 – 2003,' (2004), p. 27.

Dan Quayle photo

“Hawaii has always been a very pivotal role in the Pacific. It is in the Pacific. It is a part of the United States that is an island that is right here.”

Dan Quayle (1947) American politician, lawyer

Press comment in Hawaii (25 April 1989)

C. N. R. Rao photo

“The only part of the early concept of the elements that has survived is that elements have distinctive properties.”

C. N. R. Rao (1934) Indian chemist

Source: Understanding Chemistry (1999), p. 8

Sammy Wilson photo

“Northern Ireland has always been, part of Britain.”

Sammy Wilson (1953) British politician

As quoted in Da Ali G Show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc34JKvCQ3Q

Barack Obama photo

“Islam has always been a part of America's story.”

Barack Obama (1961) 44th President of the United States of America

2009, A New Beginning (June 2009)

Greta Garbo photo

“Garbo is lonely. She always has been and she always will be. She lives in the core of a vast aching aloneness. She is a great artist, but it is both her supreme glory and her supreme tragedy that art is to her the only reality. The figures of living men and women, the events of everyday existence, move about her, shadowy, unsubstantial. It is only when she breathes the breath of life into a part, clothes with her own flesh and blood the concept of a playwright, that she herself is fully awake, fully alive.”

Greta Garbo (1905–1990) Swedish-American actress

Marie Dressler, My Own Story as Told to Mildred Harrington (1934)

Kurien Kunnumpuram photo

“If the world had a finite reality as its goal, then it has only a limited possibility of growth. But when the world has the Infinite God as its goal, it has endless possibilities of growth and development.”

Kurien Kunnumpuram (1931–2018) Indian theologian

Kunnumpuram, Kurien, 2011 “Theological Exploration,” Jnanadeepa: Pune Journal of Religious Studies 14/2 (July-Dec 2011)
On God

Burkard Schliessmann photo

“Bach really cannot be seen, understood, and interpreted from an isolated point. Bach has to be explored as part of something complete, unique, of an universe - an aspect of human reality.”

Burkard Schliessmann classical pianist

Talkings on Bach

Freeman Dyson photo

“A point has no existence by itself. It exists only as a part of the pattern of relationships which constitute the geometry of Euclid.”

Freeman Dyson book Infinite in All Directions

Source: Infinite in All Directions (1988), Ch. 2 : Butterflies and Superstrings, p. 17
Context: Euclid... gave his famous definition of a point: "A point is that which has no parts, or which has no magnitude." …A point has no existence by itself. It exists only as a part of the pattern of relationships which constitute the geometry of Euclid. This is what one means when one says that a point is a mathematical abstraction. The question, What is a point? has no satisfactory answer. Euclid's definition certainly does not answer it. The right way to ask the question is: How does the concept of a point fit into the logical structure of Euclid's geometry?... It cannot be answered by a definition.

Related topics