Lex Donaldson, "The normal science of structural contingency theory." Studying Organizations: Theory and Method. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage (1999): 51-70.
Context: Within organization studies, contingency theory has provided a coherent paradigm for the analysis of the structure of organizations. The paradigm has constituted a framework in which research progressed leading to the construction of a scientific body of knowledge... Contingency theory states that there is no single organizational structure that is highly effective for all organizations. It sees the structure that is optimal as varying according to certain factors such as organizational strategy or size. Thus the optimal structure is contingent upon these factors which are termed the contingency factors. For example, a small-sized organization, one that has few employees, is optimally structured by a centralized structure in which decision-making authority is concentrated at the top of the hierarchy, whereas a large organization, one that has many employees, is optimally structured by a decentralized structure in which decision-making authority is dispersed down to lower levels of the hierarchy.
“Fit is a feasible set of equally effective internally consistent patterns of organizational context and structure.”
Robert Drazin, and Andrew H. Van de Ven. "Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory." Administrative science quarterly (1985): 514-539.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Andrew H. Van de Ven 2
American business theorist 1945Related quotes

Source: Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History (6th ed., 2006), Chapter 2, Origins of the Great Twentieth Century Conflicts, p. 34.
Source: The contingency theory of organizations, 2001, p. 23.
Source: 1970s, Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View, 1970, p. 52

“Mathematics… is the set of all possible self-consistent structures”
Source: Hyperspace (1995), Ch.15 Conclusion<!--p.328-->
Context: Mathematics... is the set of all possible self-consistent structures, and there are vastly more logical structures than physical principles.

Source: "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields," 1983, p. 148
Source: "The Population Ecology of Organizations," 1977, p. 957

Source: Seth, Dreams & Projections of Consciousness, (1986), p. 238