“This case reminds me of one in which I likened the plaintiff's case to a colander, because it was so full of holes.”
Ex Parte Hall (1882) 19 Ch.D. 580, 584.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
George Jessel (jurist)8
British politician 1824–1883Related quotes
Bobby Fischer (1943–2008) American chess prodigy, chess player, and chess writer
Source: Radio Interview, July 6 2001 http://www.geocities.jp/bobbby_b/mp3/F_18_1.MP3
Henry Moore (1898–1986) English artist
1970 and later
Source: The Donald Caroll interviews, Talmy Franklin, London 1973, p. 378
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. (1841–1935) United States Supreme Court justice
Northern Securities Co. v. United States, 193 U.S. 197, 400-401 (1904).
1900s
Karl Popper (1902–1994) Austrian-British philosopher of science
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1963)
Garth Nix (1963) Australian fantasy writer
"I think so-"
"Shut up! That was not a question!"
Source: The Keys to the Kingdom series, Sir Thursday (2006), p. 124.
“I know of no single case in which it has failed.”
Mahatma Gandhi (1869–1948) pre-eminent leader of Indian nationalism during British-ruled India
1940s, To Every Briton (1940)
Context: This is no appeal made by a man who does not know his business. I have been practising with scientific precision non-violence and its possibilities for an unbroken period of over fifty years. I have applied it in every walk of life, domestic, institutional, economic and political. I know of no single case in which it has failed. Where it has seemed sometimes to have failed, I have ascribed it to my imperfections. I claim no perfection for my self. But I do claim to be a passionate seeker after Truth, which is but another name for God. In the course of the search the discovery of non-violence came to me. Its spread is my life-mission. I have no interest in living except for the prosecution of that mission.
James Madison (1751–1836) 4th president of the United States (1809 to 1817)
Federalist No. 46
1780s, Federalist Papers (1787–1788)
Context: Should an unwarrantable measure of the federal government be unpopular in particular States, which would seldom fail to be the case, or even a warrantable measure be so, which may sometimes be the case, the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps, refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union; the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassments created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, difficulties not to be despised; would form, in a large State, very serious impediments; and where the sentiments of several adjoining States happened to be in unison, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.