
1990s, Defending the Cause of Human Freedom (1994)
1990s, Defending the Cause of Human Freedom (1994)
1990s, Defending the Cause of Human Freedom (1994)
Brooks D. Simpson. "Race and Slavery, North and South: Some Logical Fallacies" https://cwcrossroads.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/race-and-slavery-north-and-south-some-logical-fallacies/#comment-47560 (18 June 2011), Crossroads, WordPress
2010s
1990s, Defending the Cause of Human Freedom (1994)
2000s, Is Diversity Good? (2003)
Context: To allow slavery to be introduced into free territories, where it had not hitherto existed, was, Abraham Lincoln held, a very bad thing. His opponent, Stephen A. Douglas, held that it was a sacred right, belonging to the people of each territory, to decide for themselves whether or not to have slavery among their domestic institutions. According to Douglas, Lincoln wanted to destroy the diversity upon which the union had subsisted, by insisting that all the states ought to be free. But for Douglas himself, the principle of 'popular sovereignty' did not admit of exceptions. There was to be no diversity, no deviation from the right of the people to decide. For Lincoln the wrongness of slavery meant that no one, and no people, had the right to decide in its favor. For Lincoln, the principle of human equality, "that all men are created equal", did not admit exceptions.
2000s, The Real Abraham Lincoln: A Debate (2002), The Lincoln-Douglas Debates
"Lincoln and the Priests of Academe"
1990s, United States - Essays 1952-1992 (1992)
Source: 1880s, Life and Times of Frederick Douglass (1881), p. 364.
1970s, First Vice-Presidential address (1973)
Source: 2000s, A New Birth of Freedom: Abraham Lincoln and the Coming of the Civil War (2000), p. 228
Writing for the court, Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 381 (1963)
Judicial opinions