“In general the claim can be supported that a view of classical political economy as committed to extreme laissez-faire or unmitigated economic individualism misrepresents or at the very least analytically overgeneralizes their circumscribed theoretical and practical aims. In general then, with regard to both political and economic liberty, the classical political economists might be seen to be united in their efforts to theorize and systematize the productive and allocating functions of the mechanism of the market as the most efficient means to engender the growth of wealth. At the same time, classicals such as Smith, Malthus, Ricardo, and Mill recognized that the market, of necessity, operated in a larger context of restriction – not only legal, but equally as important, within political, religious, moral, and conventional restrictions – which could not be readily or in some cases even desirably overcome.”
"Classical Political Economy", in Coole, Diana H.; Gibbons, Michael; Ellis, Elisabeth et al., The encyclopedia of political thought (2014); see also Adam Smith
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Shannon C. Stimson 1
American political theorist 1951Related quotes
Source: The Invention of Capitalism: Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation (2000), p. 2
Source: The Human Side of Enterprise (1960), p. 16 (p. 23 in 2006 edition)
In shock poll, Libertarian Johnson beats Trump among economists (August 23, 2016)

Source: Essay in American Spectator Magazine (1977).

Source: 1950s–1970s, Maximum Principles in Analytical Economics, 1970, p. 62: Lead paragraph
Source: Spectrum: From Right to Left in the World of Ideas (2005), Foreword, p. xi
Source: A History of Economic Thought (1939), Chapter IV, The Classical System, p. 193