Human Selection, Popular Science Monthly, volume 38 (November 1890) page 93.
(Misquoted in the article Evolution and You, in Awake! magazine, 8 August 1995).
“I well remember receiving from one of the most earnest of my seniors the friendly warning that it was waste of time to study variation, for "Darwin had swept the field." Parenthetically we may notice that though scientific opinion in general became rapidly converted to the doctrine of pure selection, there was one remarkable exception. Systematists for the most part kept aloof. Everyone was convinced that natural selection operating in a continuously varying population was a sufficient account of the origin of species except the one class of scientific workers whose labours familiarised them with the phenomenon of specific difference. From that time the systematists became, as they still in great measure remain, a class apart.”
Introductory Chapter, p. 3
Mendel's Principles of Heredity (1913)
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
William Bateson 16
British geneticist and biologist 1861–1926Related quotes
https://twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/566866395540246528 (15 February 2015)
Twitter
Price, G.R. (1995). "The nature of selection." Journal of Theoretical Biology 175:389-396 (written circa 1971)
"Double Trouble", pp. 38–40
The Panda's Thumb (1980)
Source: Classification and indexing in science (1958), Chapter 1: The need for classification, p. 3.
Source: Practical Pictorial Photography, 1898, Tone and atmoshphere, p. 46
Ernst Mayr (1988) Toward a new philosophy of biology: observations of an evolutionist. p. 457