Nigel Lawson (1932) British Conservative politician and journalist
Speech http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1987/mar/17/the-economic-background in the House of Commons (17 March 1987)
Speech http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1987/mar/17/the-economic-background in the House of Commons (17 March 1987)
Nigel Lawson (1932) British Conservative politician and journalist
Speech http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1987/mar/17/the-economic-background in the House of Commons (17 March 1987)
“At 2 per cent growth a year, an economy doubles in size in just thirty years.”
Paul Ormerod book The Death of Economics
Part I, Chapter 2, Measuring Prosperity, p. 23
The Death of Economics (1994)
Nigel Lawson (1932) British Conservative politician and journalist
Speech http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1988/mar/21/budget-resolutions-and-economic-situation in the House of Commons (21 March 1988)
Herman E. Daly (1938) American economist
A steady-state economy, 2008
Francis Escudero (1969) Filipino politician
2009, Speech: The Socio-Economic Peace Program of Senator Francis Escudero
Variant: After the 2nd World War, the Philippines had the second highest per capita GDP in Asia. Today, we have one of the lowest.
Éric Pichet (1960) economist
Le programme de stabilité et le pacte de responsabilité : la trajectoire des finances publiques de 2014 à 2017 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2499496 Article in Revue de Droit Fiscal n31-35 (2014). <br class="br">Structural reforms, The French Economy corsets
Robert Lucas Jr. (1937) American economist
As contained in The Rational Expectations Revolution: Readings From the Front Line https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0262631555, Preston J. Miller, MIT Press (reprint 1994), pp. 5-6 <br class="br">"After Keynesian macroeconomics" 1978
Jason Hickel (1982) author
Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World (2021)
Source: Rise of the Juggernaut, pp. 111-112
Henry George book Progress and Poverty
Introductory : The Problem
Progress and Poverty (1879)
Context: It is true that wealth has been greatly increased, and that the average of comfort, leisure, and refinement has been raised; but these gains are not general. In them the lowest class do not share. I do not mean that the condition of the lowest class has nowhere nor in anything been improved; but that there is nowhere any improvement which can be credited to increased productive power. I mean that the tendency of what we call material progress is in nowise to improve the condition of the lowest class in the essentials of healthy, happy human life. Nay, more, that it is still further to depress the condition of the lowest class. The new forces, elevating in their nature though they be, do not act upon the social fabric from underneath, as was for a long time hoped and believed, but strike it at a point intermediate between top and bottom. It is as though an immense wedge were being forced, not underneath society, but through society. Those who are above the point of separation are elevated, but those who are below are crushed down.