
“[There are] judges who stretch the law…to suit reactionary attitudes.”
On ITV's People and Politics (9 May 1974)
1970s
The Cynic's Calendar
“[There are] judges who stretch the law…to suit reactionary attitudes.”
On ITV's People and Politics (9 May 1974)
1970s
Understanding Islam, "Morals and Ethics" http://vod.dmi.ae/media/96716/Ep_03_Morals_and_Ethics Dubai Media
Fatawa-i-Jahandari, p.64. quoted from Lal, K. S. (1992). The legacy of Muslim rule in India. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan. Chapter 4
Fatawa-i-Jahandari
Martin v. Mackonochie (1878), L. R. 3 Q. B. 775.
In Quest of Democracy (1991)
Context: The words 'law and order' have so frequently been misused as an excuse for oppression that the very phrase has become suspect in countries which have known authoritarian rule. [... ] There is no intrinsic virtue to law and order unless 'law' is equated with justice and 'order' with the discipline of a people satisfied that justice has been done. Law as an instrument of state oppression is a familiar feature of totalitarianism. Without a popularly elected legislature and an independent judiciary to ensure due process, the authorities can enforce as 'law' arbitrary decrees that are in fact flagrant negations of all acceptable norms of justice. There can be no security for citizens in a state where new 'laws' can be made and old ones changed to suit the convenience of the powers that be. The iniquity of such practices is traditionally recognized by the precept that existing laws should not be set aside at will.
“Where there is independence there must be the normal law.”
Source: Enigmas Of Chance (1985), Chapter 4, On Toast!, p. 90.
Hayek's Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek (2003)