“The subject is not just the theory of evolution, the subject is the reality of God.”
Phillip E. Johnson (1940–2019) American Law clerk
Hank Hanegraaf's "Bible Answer Man" radio program (19 December 2001)
2000s
Source: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973), p. 109
“The subject is not just the theory of evolution, the subject is the reality of God.”
Phillip E. Johnson (1940–2019) American Law clerk
Hank Hanegraaf's "Bible Answer Man" radio program (19 December 2001)
2000s
Mircea Eliade (1907–1986) Romanian historian of religion, fiction writer and philosopher
Journal entry (7 October 1965) as published in No Souvenirs (1977) later retitled Journal II, 1957-1969 (1989), p. 269.
Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964) Indian lawyer, statesman, and writer, first Prime Minister of India
Jawaharlal Nehru's Speeches 1949 - 1953 (1954), p. 235
Weston La Barre (1911–1996) anthropologist
Source: Hallucinogens and the Shamanic Origins of Religion (1972), p. 264
H. Dieter Zeh (1932–2018) German physicist
referring to his attempts to understand Copenhagen interpretation proponents Nonlocality versus nonreality http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/323, FQXi (Foundational Questions in Physics & Cosmology) Blog (2008)
Russell Jacoby (1945) American historian
Source: Social Amnesia: A Critique of Conformist Psychology from Adler to Laing (1975), p. 41
Roman Frydman (1948) American economist
"Which Way Forward for Macroeconomics and Policy Analysis?" 2013
John C. Eccles (1903–1997) Australian neurophysioloigst
As quoted in the Introduction of Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1963) by Karl Popper
C.G. Jung (1875–1961) Swiss psychiatrist and psychotherapist who founded analytical psychology
Source: The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (1934), p. 42-43
Context: Whereas the personal unconscious consists for the most part of "complexes", the content of the collective unconscious is made up essentially of "archetypes". The concept of the archetype, which is an indispensable correlate of the idea of the collective unconscious, indicates the existence of definite forms in the psyche which seem to be present always and everywhere. Mythological research calls them 'motifs'; in the psychology of primitives they correspond to Levy-Bruhl's concept of "representations collectives," and in the field of comparative religion they have been defined by Hubert and Mauss as 'categories of the imagination'... My thesis, then, is as follows: In addition to our immediate consciousness, which is of a thoroughly personal nature and which we believe to be the only empirical psyche (even if we tack on the personal unconscious as an appendix), there exists a second psychic system of a collective, universal, and impersonal nature which is identical in all individuals.