“Then, as always, I felt morally obligated to advocate our official position, even when it conflicted with my personal views.”

Source: The Methods of Ethics (1874), Book 3, chapter 13, section 3 (7th ed., 1907)

Source: 1860s, Letter to Horace Greeley (1862)

Source: Cosmos (1980), p. 184

Source: Blameless in Abaddon (1996), Chapter 15 (p. 391; spoken by the Devil)

Brilliantine
Atómstöðin (The Atom Station) (1948)

To question genetic intelligence is not racism (2007)
Context: Science is no stranger to controversy. The pursuit of discovery, of knowledge, is often uncomfortable and disconcerting. I have never been one to shy away from stating what I believe to be the truth, however difficult it might prove to be. This has, at times, got me in hot water.
Rarely more so than right now, where I find myself at the centre of a storm of criticism. I can understand much of this reaction. For if I said what I was quoted as saying, then I can only admit that I am bewildered by it. To those who have drawn the inference from my words that Africa, as a continent, is somehow genetically inferior, I can only apologise unreservedly. That is not what I meant. More importantly from my point of view, there is no scientific basis for such a belief.
I have always fiercely defended the position that we should base our view of the world on the state of our knowledge, on fact, and not on what we would like it to be. This is why genetics is so important. For it will lead us to answers to many of the big and difficult questions that have troubled people for hundreds, if not thousands, of years.
But those answers may not be easy, for, as I know all too well, genetics can be cruel. My own son may be one of its victims. Warm and perceptive at the age of 37, Rufus cannot lead an independent life because of schizophrenia, lacking the ability to engage in day-to-day activities.

Source: Blue-Eyed Devil