Refusing to allow the International Court in the Hague to rule on his nationalisation of oil interests
“The rule is this: that wherever there is a decision of a Court of concurrent jurisdiction, the other Courts will adopt that as the basis of their decision, provided it can be appealed from. If it cannot be appealed from, then they will exercise their own judgment.”
Leech v. North Staffordshire Railway Co. (1860), 29 L. J. M. C. 155.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Sir Frederick Pollock, 1st Baronet 11
British lawyer and Tory politician 1783–1870Related quotes
“Mob rule cannot be allowed to override the decisions of our courts.”
1950s, Address to the American People on the Situation in Little Rock (1957)
"Britain should be defending European justice, not attacking it", The Independent, Tuesday 24 January 2012 http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/nicolas-bratza-britain-should-be-defending-european-justice-not-attacking-it-6293689.html
Evans v. Manchester, &c. Rail. Co. (1887), L. J. (N. S.) 57 C. D. 157.
1980s, First term of office (1981–1985), Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation (1983)
Escudero, F. [Francis]. (2016, March 8). Retrieved from Official Facebook Page of Francis Escudero https://www.facebook.com/senchizescudero/posts/10153924021225610/
2016, Facebook
Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990).
1990s
Biden reacts to leaked draft Supreme Court opinion on abortion https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-reacts-leaked-draft-supreme-court-opinion-abortion/story?id=84467397
2022, May 2022
“For the truth of the conclusions of physical science, observation is the supreme Court of Appeal.”
The Philosophy of Physical Science (1938)
Context: For the truth of the conclusions of physical science, observation is the supreme Court of Appeal. It does not follow that every item which we confidently accept as physical knowledge has actually been certified by the Court; our confidence is that it would be certified by the Court if it were submitted. But it does follow that every item of physical knowledge is of a form which might be submitted to the Court. It must be such that we can specify (although it may be impracticable to carry out) an observational procedure which would decide whether it is true or not. Clearly a statement cannot be tested by observation unless it is an assertion about the results of observation. Every item of physical knowledge must therefore be an assertion of what has been or would be the result of carrying out a specified observational procedure. <!-- p. 9