Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 23.
“The production of security should, in the interests of the consumers of this intangible commodity, remain subject to the law of free competition. … [N]o government should have the right to prevent another government from going into competition with it, or to require consumers of security to come exclusively to it for this commodity.”
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 22
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Gustave de Molinari 28
Belgian political economist and classical liberal theorist 1819–1912Related quotes
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 22–23.
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 22
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 22
“Competition does a much more effective job than government at protecting consumers.”
Bogeyman Economics
1980s–1990s, Compassion Versus Guilt and Other Essays (1987)
Source: Compassion Versus Guilt, and Other Essays: And Other Essays
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 24
Context: But why should there be an exception relative to security? What special reason is there that the production of security cannot be relegated to free competition? Why should it be subjected to a different principle and organized according to a different system?
(1847)
Source: The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1977), p.5
The Divine Commodity: Discovering A Faith Beyond Consumer Christianity (2009, Zondervan)