
Duke of Devonshire v. O'Connor (1890), L. R. 24 Q. B. D. 473.
The King v. Bishop of Ely (1750), 1 Black. Rep. 58. If it be a matter
Duke of Devonshire v. O'Connor (1890), L. R. 24 Q. B. D. 473.
Refusing to allow the International Court in the Hague to rule on his nationalisation of oil interests
Laver v. Fielder (1862), 32 Beav. 13.
The Ballot or the Bullet (1964), Speech in Detroit, Michigan (12 April 1964)
Context: So those of us whose political, and economic, and social philosophy is black nationalism have become involved in the civil rights struggle. We have injected ourselves into the civil rights struggle, and we intend to expand it from the level of civil rights to the level of human rights. As long as you’re fighting on the level of civil rights, you’re under Uncle Sam’s jurisdiction. You’re going to his court expecting him to correct the problem. He created the problem. He’s the criminal. You don’t take your case to the criminal; you take your criminal to court.
“The Court has not time to indulge in the discussion of imaginary cases.”
Sidebotham v. Barrington (1841), 3 Beav. 529.
Quote
UN calls for suspension of TTIP talks over fears of human rights abuses http://www.theguardian.com/global/2015/may/04/ttip-united-nations-human-right-secret-courts-multinationals.
2015
Leech v. North Staffordshire Railway Co. (1860), 29 L. J. M. C. 155.
https://books.google.com/books?id=NTQ0AQAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA152 Page 152
Blackstone’s Commentaries (1803)