Source: The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832), p. 224
“What is the true End of Monarchy? Not to deprive People of their natural Liberty; but to correct their Actions, in order to attain the supreme Good.
The Form of Government, therefore, which best attains this End, and at the same Time sets less Bounds than others to natural Liberty, is that which coincides with the Views and Purposes of rational Creatures, and answers the End, upon which we ought to fix a steadfast Eye in the Regulations of civil Polity.”
Proposals for a New Law Code (1768)
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Catherine the Great 29
Empress of Russia 1729–1796Related quotes
“We ought to consider what is the end of government, before we determine which is the best form.”
1770s, Thoughts on Government (1776)
Context: We ought to consider what is the end of government, before we determine which is the best form. Upon this point all speculative politicians will agree, that the happiness of society is the end of government, as all Divines and moral Philosophers will agree that the happiness of the individual is the end of man. From this principle it will follow, that the form of government which communicates ease, comfort, security, or, in one word, happiness, to the greatest number of persons, and in the greatest degree, is the best.
Article on Government
L'Encyclopédie (1751-1766)
Lecture I, p. 23
The Duties of Women (1881)
Discourse no. 13; vol. 2, p. 136.
Discourses on Art
1920s, Authority and Religious Liberty (1924)
The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self, 1984
The Rights of the Colonists (1772)
Context: The natural liberty of man, by entering into society, is abridged or restrained, so far only as is necessary for the great end of society, the best good of the whole. In the state of nature every man is, under God, judge and sole judge of his own rights and of the injuries done him. By entering into society he agrees to an arbiter or indifferent judge between him and his neighbors; but he no more renounces his original right than by taking a cause out of the ordinary course of law, and leaving the decision to referees or indifferent arbitrators. In the last case, he must pay the referees for time and trouble. He should also be willing to pay his just quota for the support of government, the law, and the constitution; the end of which is to furnish indifferent and impartial judges in all cases that may happen, whether civil, ecclesiastical, marine, or military.
Source: The Functions of the Executive (1938), p. 19 (in 1968 edition)