Source: 1970s, Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View, 1970, p. 59
“A great deal of organizational effort is exerted to control the effects of extra-organizational influence:; upon personnel. Daily, people come contaminated into the organization… Many of the irritating aspects of [[organizational structure] are designed to control these sources of contamination.”
Source: 1970s, Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View, 1970, p. 52
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Charles Perrow 71
American sociologist 1925–2019Related quotes
Richard M. Burton, Bo Eriksen, Dorthe Døjbak Håkonsson (2008). Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. p. 5
Lex Donaldson, "The normal science of structural contingency theory." Studying Organizations: Theory and Method. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage (1999): 51-70.
Context: Within organization studies, contingency theory has provided a coherent paradigm for the analysis of the structure of organizations. The paradigm has constituted a framework in which research progressed leading to the construction of a scientific body of knowledge... Contingency theory states that there is no single organizational structure that is highly effective for all organizations. It sees the structure that is optimal as varying according to certain factors such as organizational strategy or size. Thus the optimal structure is contingent upon these factors which are termed the contingency factors. For example, a small-sized organization, one that has few employees, is optimally structured by a centralized structure in which decision-making authority is concentrated at the top of the hierarchy, whereas a large organization, one that has many employees, is optimally structured by a decentralized structure in which decision-making authority is dispersed down to lower levels of the hierarchy.
Kenneth D. Mackenzie (1986), Organizational design: the organizational audit and analysis technology. p. 154
Richard M. Burton, Børge Obel, Gerardine DeSanctis (2011). Organizational Design: A Step-by-Step Approach. p. 3
Richard M. Burton Børge Obel, Gerardine DeSanctis (2011). Organizational Design: A Step-by-Step Approach. p. 3
Source: The transformation of corporate control, 1993, p. 10 ; As cited in: François L'Italien, BÉHÉMOTH CAPITAL. Contribution à une théorie dialectique de la financiarisation de la grande corporation. Université Laval, 2012. p. 147 (Many of the following quotes came from this source)
Robert Drazin, and Andrew H. Van de Ven. "Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory." Administrative science quarterly (1985): 514-539.

Philip Kotler (1993), as cited in: Gerald A. Cole (2003), Strategic Management, p. 131
Source: "Foundations of the Theory of Organization," 1948, p. 25