“A lie took two parties - the weaver of the tale and the sucker who so badly wanted to believe it.”

Source: Salem Falls

Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "A lie took two parties - the weaver of the tale and the sucker who so badly wanted to believe it." by Jodi Picoult?
Jodi Picoult photo
Jodi Picoult 595
Author 1966

Related quotes

Jodi Picoult photo

“… when they look at me, I so badly want to be who they see.”

Jodi Picoult (1966) Author

Source: Vanishing Acts

Jodi Picoult photo
Sylvia Day photo
Ludovico Ariosto photo

“But that he wrought so high the specious tale,
As manifested plainly, 'twas a lie.”

Se non volea pulir sua scusa tanto,
Che la facesse di menzogna rea.
Canto XVIII, stanza 84 (tr. W. S. Rose)
Orlando Furioso (1532)

Friedrich Nietzsche photo

“There are two different types of people in the world, those who want to know, and those who want to believe.”

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) German philosopher, poet, composer, cultural critic, and classical philologist
George Washington Plunkitt photo
Christopher Hampton photo

“I always divide people into two groups. Those who live by what they know to be a lie, and those who live by what they believe, falsely, to be the truth.”

Christopher Hampton (1946) British playwright, screenwriter and film director

Don, in The Philanthropist (1969), scene 6

Diana Gabaldon photo
Noam Chomsky photo

“There are two parties, so-called, but they're really factions of the same party, the Business Party.”

Noam Chomsky (1928) american linguist, philosopher and activist

Quotes 1990s, 1990-1994, Interview by Adam Jones, 1990
Context: In the United States, the political system is a very marginal affair. There are two parties, so-called, but they're really factions of the same party, the Business Party. Both represent some range of business interests. In fact, they can change their positions 180 degrees, and nobody even notices. In the 1984 election, for example, there was actually an issue, which often there isn't. The issue was Keynesian growth versus fiscal conservatism. The Republicans were the party of Keynesian growth: big spending, deficits, and so on. The Democrats were the party of fiscal conservatism: watch the money supply, worry about the deficits, et cetera. Now, I didn't see a single comment pointing out that the two parties had completely reversed their traditional positions. Traditionally, the Democrats are the party of Keynesian growth, and the Republicans the party of fiscal conservatism. So doesn't it strike you that something must have happened? Well, actually, it makes sense. Both parties are essentially the same party. The only question is how coalitions of investors have shifted around on tactical issues now and then. As they do, the parties shift to opposite positions, within a narrow spectrum.

Terry Goodkind photo

Related topics